The Daily Gopher: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


Rankings Ratings and Rantings

For the fun of it I thought I'd throw out a snapshot of where the Gopher's are ranked in various polls.  Each ranking and rating has a different method of calculation and all of them are meaningless.

Minnesota National Rank Minn rank among B10 Teams Brief Description of Ranking
AP 18 2 72 media votes
ESPN/USA Today 17 2 31 coach's votes
KenPom Rank 47 3 efficiency stats, more of a predictor
RPI 20 3 complicated NCAA formula using SOS and record vs. other top teams
Lundardi RPI 5 1 Joe Lunardi's tweak of the RPI
Sagarin 33 6 Computer ranking similar to RPI but different!
Blog Poll 21 2 some of the most brilliant college basketball minds collaborating for a prestigious top 25

Clearly we can all agree that the Lunardi RPI is the most accurate representation of who the best teams are in the country.  I am one who finds these rankings to be interesting and fun to talk about.  Getting your team ranked is valuable for discussions at the bar and on the surface level comparing team x to team y.  But we all know this means very little on January 12th.  Even the rankings on March 15th (selection Sunday) do not mean a whole heck of a lot as teams that are media or coach ranked can and do miss out on the NCAA tournament. 

What stands out to me is we average out to be the #2 ranked team in the conference.  I realize that Purdue is struggling and Wisconsin is anything but unbeatable but I just do not feel as though this team is destined to have the #2 seed in the conference tournament. 

I think I've said it before, I'll say it now and I'll probably say it many times again.  I really like this Gopher team but I just do not see them as a Sweet 16 caliber team.  On the surface I see this team one that doesn't make it to the second weekend of the tourny.  It is realy impossible to predict something like this and foolish to try because matchups and results of the other games will ultimately mean more than anything else.  But I'll stick to my guns that "on the surface" this is not a Sweet 16 caliber team (this year). 

----------

Each week I have been voting in the college hoops blog poll.  Rarely have I posted my ballot or the end result.  But below is my ballot for you to pick apart. 

Duke 1
Pittsburgh 2
Wake Forest 3
North Carolina 4
Oklahoma 5
Connecticut 6
Michigan State 7
Clemson 8
UCLA 9
Syracuse 10
Gonzaga 11
Texas 12
Notre Dame 13
Georgetown 14
Purdue 15
Arizona State 16
Marquette 17
Xavier 18
Minnesota 19
Baylor 20
Villanova 21
Butler 22
Illinois 23
Louisville 24
Wisconsin 25

Now rant...

0 recs | Comment 7 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from The Daily Gopher

Hoops Blog Poll

Mar 2009 by GopherNation - 0 comments

Hoops Blog Poll - wk 14

Feb 2009 by GopherNation - 0 comments

Final Blog Poll v.16.1

Jan 2009 by GopherNation - 8 comments

Comments

Display:

Can someone explain to me

How in Lunardi’s latest projection we fell to an 8 seed from a 6 seed the previous week. I know it means nothing this early in the season but I don’t get how two conference wins and beating Penn State by 20 drops us two seeds. We are #18 in the AP and our RPI is 21. I don’t see how that is an 8 seed. I just hope we don’t get shafted like this when it is for real.

by duckman86 on Jan 12, 2009 6:13 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My hypothesis

I was wondering the same thing. I do know this: at this point in the season, Lunardi doesn’t take the teams as they are right now—it is too early. In other words, he doesn’t assume the season ends today. He will assume that in a month or so as the standings start to take form. The reason he doesn’t assume that teams will end where they are now is because the small sample size of conference play. For instance, North Carolina would finish last in the ACC. Obviously, this won’t happen.

Instead, he is adding his own conjecture to it. He is predicting Minnesota to fall a little closer to the middle of the pack in the Big 10. I thought he had them a little too high at #6 before, so I think #8 was probably a correction. Perhaps he watched that dreadful Iowa game (it was on ESPN) and decided there is no way we are going to be a #6 seed. But if we win in Wisconsin on Thursday, I’m sure you will see a big jump for the Golden Gophers.

Also, I’ve been on the Minnesota/Kentucky 1st round watch for a long time now. It definitely could happen and will happen if the seeds work out. However, lets not forget about the other story line out there. If we finish with a high enough seed, the selection committee could pit us against our old pal Dan Monson from Long Beach State. They are currently leading the Big West at 4-0. If LBSU continues playing well, they could end up as a #13 seed. If the Gophers have a good showing in Big 10 play, we could find ourselves as a #4 creating this matchup. This is obviously optimistic, but not out of the realm of possibility. So let me be the first to call out the Gophers/49ers watch.

by rencito on Jan 13, 2009 12:02 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't understand...

In Joe Lunardi "Bracketology he has the Gophers moving down with two wins this week and Kentucky moving up two spots with one loss and one win. He has Minnesota at the 8th spot and Kentucky at the 9th spot. I just don’t understand this at all. Kentucky has four losses, one of them a team that Minnesota beat, they aren’t even ranked in the top 25 nor did they get any votes and they are ranked one spot lower than the Gophers?
I just think sportwriters want the Gophers and Kentucky to play each other so badly they they will print anything. I would love to see them match up, but not a first round game. If the Gophers play Kentucky they will win. Kentucky plays nothing but a man-to-man defense and won’t go out of it. A good point guard like Nolen will kill them. But I’ll bet ya almost all the of major sportswriters want Kentucky to beat the Gophers.

John Maynard

by COJOMAY on Jan 12, 2009 9:36 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Think It Would Be A Good Match-Up

Gopher defense and PG excellence versus Patterson inside and Meeks outside (as scorers).

by FortyYearCatFan on Jan 13, 2009 6:18 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I stopped reading after....

I saw Duke ranked number one. That made me laugh.

by Hussy Hideous Hoffarber on Jan 13, 2009 3:08 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I maybe threw up a little when I did that

but I’m not sold on Pitt either. Duke has the #1 defense in the country and a much tougher schedule than Pitt (to date).

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Jan 14, 2009 10:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minnesota Golden Gophers sports--Usually analytical, sometimes snarky.
Start posting about the Golden Gophers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Gophersolantern_small
La Crosse Logan accepts scholarship from Gophers
Mn_basketball_small
The Daily Gopher is on vacation
Nerf_small
Great Moments in Gopher Recruiting History
Dsc02076_small
JD Pride is in Ann Arbor today
Dsc02076_small
Tim Brewster's Record Mixup? "Taken Out of Context"
Small
No Beer Here - TCF Bank Stadium to be Dry Thanks to Misguided Law
Mn_basketball_small
Gopher Baseball in NCAA Tournament links
Movie_sm_small
Come on Gophers..
Sirtipsy_small
Summer is here... sort of
Morneaujustin_small
Cory Joseph Now #6 in Rivals 150

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Mn_basketball_small GopherNation

Yp_kelly-minnesota-011_37832_small PJS

Editors

Operahouse_small rencito

Small JG2112

Official Partner of CBS Sports