Gophers to play Texas in home and home series, someday
For better or worse the Gopher football is seeing a transformation in nearly all areas (win percentage hasn't really changed yet). In just a few short years they are playing their games outdoors on campus, they have become a factor on the national recruiting scene and scheduling MAC teams as our most challenging out of conference game has become a thing of the past. The Gophers have at least one BCS conference team the schedule for the next seven seasons with two Texas games pending...
- 2009 - Syracuse, Air Force, Cal, South Dak St
- 2010 - USC, SDSU, tbd, tbd
- 2011 - USC, NDSU, Miami(Ohio), tbd
- 2012 - Colorado, Syracuse, UNLV, tbd
- 2013 - Colorado, UNLV, W Ill, San Jose St
- 2014 - Oregon St, San Jose St, Miami(Ohio), tbd
- 2015 - Oregon St, SDSU, Ohio, tbd
Dates are not set but the Gophers are likely set to play the Longhorns. Is it possible that in 2011 we'd see both USC and Texas on the schedule? I'm guessing 2013 we will drop someone and add UT, then return in 2014 or 2015.
Most of us have always longed for a slightly more challenging schedule but never would I have imagined a year ago that we would have USC and Texas on future schedules.
What becomes interesting now is the debate, is this a good idea? For years Mason was ripped for playing nobody early and not having teams prepared for the Big Ten season. Now I'm certain you will hear a large contingent complaining that we are going to get killed and these games will just make it impossible to earn a bowl bid. As a united Gopher Nation, we can't have it both ways.
The Good
We have dipped into Texas often for recruiting and this can only help with Texas kids and other talented high school athletes around the country. Most kids would rather come to a school where they know they'll get to play USC and Texas as opposed to Toledo or South Dakota State. Especially those Texas kids, they will love the opportunity to come back home and beat the Longhorns.
This raises our national profile. I'm not talking about rankings and getting BCS games by winning these games. But just scheduling the best raises your profile. We become relevant and these kind of games get on national TV. The result of the games is important but so is just getting these games on the schedule.
Any given Saturday...I'm not counting on a win until I see some changes on the field. BUT stealing a win in just one of these games can do a LOT for a program. That goes on the recruiting resume and gives this program a ton of confidence that they can start to elevate into a good program.
This will bring in money. These games are likely to be televised nationally, maybe even a prime-time game or two. But just the revenue from these games is greater than paying "Sacrificial Directional 1AA State" to come play us.
The Bad
Despite Brewster's herculean recruiting efforts, the talent gap will still be huge. Texas and USC get their pick of four and five star recruits. The USC games in particular will have a massive talent gap. Maybe by the time we face Texas there will be several good Brewster classes to raise our overall talent level, but 2010 will still show the difference between an elite program and one trying to get to the upper echelon of their own conference.
This makes bowl games much more difficult. Gone are the days of the Mason bowl formula
three or four NC wins + two or three B10 wins = mediocre bowl
Going forward we will either have to beat the better non-conference teams or finish 5-3 in conference (Mason's best B10 mark). I would guess this means we will see seasons of either a good bowl or no bowl at all. If we get bowl eligible we will have had to beat a good team or two which elevates us above the Sun Bowl, or we will have too few wins to get to play in December.
The Ugly
These scores "could" get ugly.
- Chances to win - slim
- Chances to be competitive - decent
- Chance we get blown out - just as decent
At the very least the weeks leading up to the Texas and USC games will be a lot of fun. We'll all debate if USC has a chance at slowing down MarQueis Gray and how many times will we burn Nolan Brewster as we roll up Texas.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
You forgot part of the Good
The short 1,174 mile road trip to watch the Gophers play one of the proudest programs in football.
by WhiteSpeedReceiver on May 1, 2009 12:32 PM CDT reply actions
Unless you're a Gopher fan goign to grad school at UT...
…5 minute walk from the apartment!
by LonghornedTwin on May 2, 2009 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions
If we get blown out
by USC, then I suppose we’re on par with our conference champs, right ;)
But at the end of the day, if we lose, it still only counts as 1 in the L column. And perhaps a result of that one L is more Ws in the future. Im not sure where I heard it, but a famous coach said that his team never got over the hump until he scheduled harder teams (I think it was either Bobby Bowden or Frank Beamer)
After all, after we play USC next year, it’s all down hill from there in terms of difficulty, right?
I like this scheduling a lot
It makes watching the early games so much more exciting. Like GN was saying, the national exposure is going to be huge. The players will really get up for these games and the fans will turn out in huge numbers. I hope this trend continues!
Air Force isn't a BCS school...
…but you have it highlighted. =)
I know
I still bolded on purpose because the MWC has a very strong record against BCS schools (2nd best win % against BCS schools over last two years). They are not a BCS school but the MWC is as close as you’ll find right now.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you
Two other "bad" components you did not mention.....
.(1) this scheduling could help cost Brewster his job; and
(2) this scheduling is undoubtedly a precursor to increasing season ticket prices to pay for that stadium. I can’t imagine Minnesota will miss the opportunity to charge Iowa and Wisconsin – level prices with USC, Colorado and Texas in town.
that is likely a true statement
what would you rather have though? Cheaper tickets and Montana St on the schedule or pay a bit more to see USC some to town?
what you say here can, and will, be used against you
You'll notice in my post.....
…that I didn’t take a position on the ticket prices, I just opined that they’re likely to rise.
Of course, I prefer seeing USC rather than Montana St. And I’m willing to pay for it. I’m sure we’ll hear complaining from the Legislature or from people who “can’t afford” to see the nation’s finest Song Girls perform at TCF.
On another note, I read in the Strib that the Gopher football team lost 3 scholarships due to a lack of “academic progress.” We’re the only Big Ten team to get dinged for this.
What the heck is this? This is ridiculous. Brewster now will be playing with 82 schollies. Something to keep in mind in upcoming recruiting cycles.
For the record...
I believe this low APR score was based on data up to the ‘07-’08 team, so that includes 3 Mason teams and 1 Brewster team. The turnover in players may have had a hand in the lower score, but I’m not sure. But I believe Joel Maturi knew it was coming and they planned to undersign by 3 players in this past recruiting class. So future classes will be unaffected.
correct
the years 2004-05 through 2007-08. This is directly from the Mason years of finishing last in the Big Ten year after year in graduation rates. They were 12 for 12 graduating the most recent SR class so I’m assuming this will be less of an issue next year.
This is totally newsworthy, I feel bad that we haven’t published a post on this. Time, time, time…
what you say here can, and will, be used against you
by GopherNation on May 2, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions

by 












