Upgrade / Downgrade - Safety
by GopherNation on Jul 16, 2009 2:00 PM CDT
in Gopher Football
Email
PrintThis is going to be one of our pre-season features this summer, a great idea which I totally stole from Building the Dam (a very good Oregon St blog). With the recent confirmation that Tramaine Brock will not be returning to the Gopher secondary I'm going to do a quick comparison of Brock and his likely replacement at free safety, Kim Royston.
Gone - Tramaine Brock
|
|
| Height: | 5-10 |
| Weight: | 195 |
| Gm Played: | 13 |
| Gm Started: | 13 |
| Tackles: | 73 |
| TFL: | 2.5 |
| INT: | 1 |
| Pass Defensed: | 6 |
| Notes: | Played only 1 season for the Gophers after transferring in from the JUCO ranks where he was first team All-American and helped lead his team to a share of the NJCAA national championship. |
Incoming - Kim Royston |
|
| Height: | 5-11 |
| Weight: | 182 |
| Gm Played: | DNP in 2008 |
| Gm Started: | DNP in 2008 |
| Tackles: | DNP in 2008 |
| TFL: | DNP in 2008 |
| INT: | DNP in 2008 |
| Pass Defensed: | DNP in 2008 |
| Notes: | Recorded 1 INT as a freshman vs. Minnesota, played in 12 of 13 games as a sophomore at Wisconsin recording 14 total tackles and 1 forced fumble |
It was a little bit surprising that Brock only had 1 interception, but there is absolutely no denying that he added speed, athleticism and gave us someone capable of defending the pass at the free safety position. And he was third on the team in tackles to boot. Unfortunately his lack of academic progress is preventing him from his senior season.
Enter Kim Royston who decided not to join the Gophers out of high school, went to Wisconsin and then decided to transfer back to his home state and play for the Gophers after his sophomore season. At the time of the transfer we were all pretty excited to at the very least have some depth at safety and three Big Ten caliber players back there. As it turns out this transfer is incredibly huge, imagine our secondary situation were Royston still in Madison. There are a couple of different scenarios to consider when trying to compare if this is an upgrade or a slight downgrade.
- Scenario 1 - imagine Brock were still here, Royston pairs with Brock as our starting safeties and Theret backs them up. That is the ideal scenario so any other scenario is a downgrade from that.
- Scenario 2 - Brock is gone and Royston never transferred in! When viewed in this light then we are extremely lucky that Royston is here and the starting safeties are a huge upgrade of what we would be facing without either Brock or Royston.
When viewed straight up I think our starting safeties will give us about the same production as we got a year ago. If I had to vote I'd call this a slight downgrade but not by much. Brock and Simmons were the two biggest catalysts to improving the defense last year and I fell in love with both very early. But Brock is not irreplaceable and Royston should be at least in the upper half of Big Ten safeties.
But this is an upgrade/downgrade post so you get to voice your opinion as well. But I'm not going to make this one easy...
2 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This one is tough.
I think it will be overall a push. There would have been a little continuity with Brock there for the second year, but Royston has experience and should be fine. Where this hurts is in a nickel situation, or, if the dreaded injury bug hits. Having three quality safeties would have been nice. However, the starters are pretty good and will need to be. Teams like Cal or Ohio State (Terrelle Pryor in the open field?) will test them early and often.
SORRY THE TABLE LOOKS TERRIBLE
I’ll try to fix this evening.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
