Terrell Combs leaves, and Takes Another Little Piece of Brewster's APR
The subject of the Gophers' Academic Progress Rate has been written about in these parts before. The APR lives in some sort of alternate universe, where grade point averages don't matter (too bad for Minnesota, because a number of Gopher footballers are Academic All-Big Tenners), but keeping your kids enrolled does. For those needing a quick breakdown (Wikipedia you better be right darnit): each player on the roster is given two points per term - one for staying eligible, and one for staying with the school. The APR is calculated as the number of total points for a team, divided by the total amount of points possible, multiplied by 1,000 because people hate decimal points. If you're below a total of 925, you can get zinged.
This is intimately familiar to Minnesota, because they were docked 3 scholarships for 2009 earlier this year for having a multiyear APR of 915. That's right, 915. There are only two schools lower than Minnesota in football, and they are South Florida and Ole Miss. For the 2007-08 reporting period, the Gophers' score dropped from its previously precarious 927 to a downright disastrous 887, thanks to the results of Mason's kids leaving, and seven out of eight Brewster recruits no longer being at Minnesota (thanks to Kyle Theret for sticking around), as well as a steady flow of 2008 recruits and athletes (including Brodrick Smith, Tramaine Brock, Roszell Gayden, Vince Hill, and John Nance) leaving the program. Also, MarQueis Gray's, er, grayshirt hurt the Gopher APR.
The wound opens again this week with the news that Terrell Combs has left the program. In regards to depth or on-field play, this doesn't hurt the Gophers to any great extent. However, the APR is calculated on a rolling average over a period of years, so when any kid leaves the program it hurts the Gophers' ability to get its scholarships back (why, by the way, hasn't South Florida had more than a wrist slap for such terrible APR numbers?)
We are now left without Smith, Brock, Nance, Combs, Hasan Lipscomb and Joey Searcy (according to my scrimmage program) on the 2009 active roster. This means points taken away from the APR, and it means that the Gophers are more likely to be taking the field again next year with only 82 scholarships.
This feeds into the general consternation some Gopher fans (I think some may = me) feel when the Gopher nation welcomes, say, a 2 star recruit with offers from ONLY the directional Louisiana schools. Tim Brewster is certainly not the only guy who knew about Dwayne Mitchell - he was the MVP of his conference and had exactly ZERO offers from the BCS-conference schools in an area that knows its football. What do the rest of BCS don't know that Brewster does, or more importantly, that Brewster may be ignoring? Brewster is currently in no position to take flyers on kids that may not qualify. The Gophers have historically operated from a talent deficit in comparison to the rest of the Big Ten. There is no reason to impose self-penalties by losing quality athletes to academic ineligibility, and then compounding it with NCAA scholarship sanctions. There is no sugar-coating that Brewster needs to bring in a class with no academic casualties to get those three scholarships back.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Loss of Scholarships
An NFL roster is what, 52 players? They seem to have plenty to field a team. I don’t think losing 3 scholarships is the end of trhe world. We are now recruiting more all over the country and it is impossible to know which of these kids will get “homesick” (Broderick Smith) so there will be more casualties. Bringing in the kind of talent that Brewster is going after has some risks. It isn’t like we have a powerhouse that these kids are clamoring to get into. Brewster and his staff is working his tail off to bring athletes here and build a winning program. The result is that this year will be the most athletic team we have seen here in a very long time. We would all like to see less turnover and more graduations, but the sky is not falling here chicken little.
by Narby on Aug 26, 2009 10:18 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A NFL roster is composed
of players who are all fully mature adults that are paid professionals. There is little comparison between them and young men, most of whom have yet to reach drinking age, so toss that concept.
You also contradict yourself when you first say that three scholarships doesn’t matter all that much, but then point out that some will be homesick, leading to more attrition.
The sky isn’t falling, but scholarships always make a difference, especially when you’re trying to offer as many as possible in order to get more young athletes to stay.
Go Big Red Nebraska!
Our Cobs Are Bigger Than Yours!
Corn Nation!
Twitter!
cornnation@gmail.com
by Jon Johnston on Aug 26, 2009 9:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Contradiction???
How is that a contradiction? When you are recruiting more kids from differennt states than you have in the past you will lose some of them to the fact that they change their minds and want to play closer to home. I still don’t think that losing 3 scholarships is that big of a deal. 82 scholarships is still plenty to field a team and the difference is miniscule. (that means very small husker fan)
Since you are obviously having trouble reading what I wrote, I have to assume that it is the big words throwing you off.
by Narby on Aug 27, 2009 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Details, details ...
Players that never enroll do not affect the APR. So, guys like Grayden, Hill, Searcy, and Lipscomb are non-issues in this discussion. Not sure Mitchell is a discussion item either as he apparently has an offer from Duke.
by Harrys Ghost on Aug 26, 2009 11:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If You Guys Knew What You Were Talking About...
……..first time for everything I guess…….maybe. Merely “staying with the school?” lol What are the odds Hayyyyooooooooooo graduates?
by PantherHawk on Aug 26, 2009 11:39 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
what about arrests
Pantherhawk? Good thing they don’t ding the Pigeyes for that. How did your dog die, by the way? Did he choke on one of your Harry Potter toys?
by SenatorsGuy on Aug 27, 2009 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs











