Upgrade/Downgrade: Defensive End
Last season saw a marked turnaround for the Gopher defense. One of the leaders of that defense was senior defensive end Willie VanDeSteeg who is now in an NFL training camp. VanDeSteeg led the Gophers with 10.5 sacks, and was a constant threat to sack the quarterback.
Entering the 2009 season, the Gophers lose VanDeSteeg and William Brody to graduation. Brody recorded only 4 tackles in 2008, so the loss which could have the greatest impact on the Gophers is that of VanDeSteeg. With several defensive ends who are one year older and stronger returning to the team along with two new freshmen, will the 2009 Gophers be upgraded or downgraded at defensive end?
Let's start by taking a look at what will be lost for 2009:
Willie VanDeSteeg
6'4, 256 lbs, Senior
2008 Statistics
53 total tackles, 39 unassisted
10.5 sacks
2 forced fumbles, 1 blocked kick
Strengths: Pass rushing, causing turnovers
Weaknesses: Run containment
Summary: While losing VanDeSteeg could be a blow to the pass defense, he often did a poor job of containing the run. In particular, scrambling quarterbacks were often able to avoid containment from his side of the pocket. The most obvious case was when Northwestern's backup quarterback, Mike Kafka, ran for 217 yards. Time and time again, Kafka scrambled around VanDeSteeg's end for sizable gains in yardage.
The Replacements
Returning Starters (or players who saw the field often): Cedric McKinley and Derrick Onwuachi both will be seniors for 2009. Both saw frequent action in 2008, and will likely enter pre-season practices as the starting defensive ends. Expect both McKinley and Onwuachi to improve slightly from 2008 having spent another year refining their skills and engaging in strength conditioning. Raymond Henderson was rated as the second best player in the state of Wisconsin in 2005, and originally committed to Tennessee as a four star recruit. Henderson was at one time reportedly held back by health issues, and could be in better shape for 2009. While unlikely, there is a possibility that Henderson could reach the potential that was once predicted.
Underclassmen and Incoming Freshmen: Four players from Tim Brewster's first two recruiting classes will now have at least one year in the system, and could compete for time at defensive end. Here's a breakdown of their measurables:
| Name |
Ht |
Wt |
40 |
Yr |
Scout Stars |
Rivals Stars |
ESPN Stars |
|
6'2 |
286 |
4.6 |
So |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
6'2 |
252 |
4.53 |
So |
2 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
6'2 |
281 |
4.9 |
So |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
6'4 |
236 |
4.7 |
RFr |
2 |
3 |
2 |
Incoming freshmen Matt Garin and Kendall Greogry-McGhee have the potential to develop into effective defensive ends, but will probably need at least one year of development in the system due to the grueling physical requirements of playing on the defensive line. Of the underclassmen and incoming freshmen, look for Anthony Jacobs and Brandon Kirksey to see the most playing time.
Upgrade or Downgrade?
While a controversial prediction, look for the Gophers to be upgraded at defensive end in 2009. While Willie VanDeSteeg was an excellent pass rusher, he often failed to contain the run and the quarterback scramble on his end of the line. Take into account an extra year in the program for McKinley and Onwuachi and the maturity of four talented underclassmen, and the void left by VanDeSteeg's departure shouldn't be missed. I'll predict that the most likely scenario is for Anthony Jacobs to have a breakout season.
So, for your opinion. Will the Gophers' be upgraded or downgraded at defensive end in 2009 having lost VanDeSteeg?:
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
DE's
I think McKinley will be a stud this year. He really showed stepped up at the end of the year after making the adjustment to D-1. He is more athletic than WVS and looked much better in the bowl game than Willie. Cedric provides us with the best best chance of any to get 10+ sacks. Jacobs looks more like a run-stopping DE or combination DE/DT and if we are relying on Onwuochi for a pass-rush we are screwed.
Defensive Ends don't play by themselves
How the DEs perform is largely dependent on interior line play. If the tackles constantly need to be double-teamed, that will obviously open up opportunities for DEs. Our tackles are more experienced, better conditioned and deeper this year. Probably the best rotation we have had since the 10 win team.
I don’t understand the logic of evaluating the DEs independently. DL has to be evaluated in its entirety. Better yet, the front-seven should be evaluated in its entirety.
better yet the entire defense
they all work together so if DLs and DEs are tied together and they are tied to LB play, and if the front 7 can’t get pressure on the QB then that affects the secondary. I think we all realized it is all tied together, but this is a simple upgrade/downgrade post. Forget the DT play, assuming all things being equal is this an upgrade or a downgrade?
what you say here can, and will, be used against you
These guys need to be stout....
in the run game all year long. Who knows about Syracuse, but after that the Gophers are fed Air Force (77% running team in 2008), Cal (Jahvid Best), Northwestern (Kafka), Wisconsin (John Clay), Purdue (three average to good RBs), Ohio State (Pryor, Herron and Saine), Penn State (Darryl Clark, Evan Royster and Stephon Green), and Illinois (Juice and Dufrene).
If we can’t stop the run, we’re toast against those teams, and the pass rush won’t matter. To that end, let’s hope McKinley handles rush defense better than WvdS. And, Cosgrove should be better equipped to handle these rushing attacks than he was able to combat the pass-happy spreads he saw in the Big Twelve.
True dat
If we can’t stop the run, we’re toast
In this Big Ten, plus the Air Force and Cal games we HAVE to be good against the run.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by 













