Wisconsin Week by the Numbers, Part 2
On Monday, I broke down the offensive performances of both Wisconsin and Minnesota through the first four weeks of the season. For part two of my Wisconsin week preview, let's break down how both teams have fared on the defensive side of the ball. The following graph compares both team defenses versus what their opponents have allowed on average:

Both teams have allowed fewer rushing yards than would be expected form an average defense. Minnesota has allowed slightly more passing yards per game than the average, while Wisconsin has allowed nearly 20% more passing yards than would be expected from an average defense. At first glance, Minnesota and Wisconsin both appear to have strong defenses against the run while Minnesota has a slightly better pass defense.
Now let's break down the performances of the defenses by week:

After defeating Wofford, it was reported that Wisconsin had a strong showing against the pass by only allowing 47 yards through the air for the game. That number seems impressive until you consider that Wofford only averages 57.3 yards per game with their passing attack. Both Fresno State and Michigan State were able to establish effective passing games against the Badgers. On the other hand, Minnesota's pass defense has been below average against every team since game one at Syracuse.
Overall, comparing the performance of the Minnesota and Wisconsin defenses doesn't reveal any glaring differences between the two teams. Minnesota may have a slight advantage defending against the pass, but even so they have performed slightly below average in that area.
In Part 3 of my Wisconsin Week analysis, I'll take a look at scoring, turnovers, and tying all three parts of the analysis together for a prediction of Saturday's storyline.
FYI - I'll have the Daily Nuggz out by 10:00 AM.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“Both Fresno State and Michigan State were able to establish effective passing games against the Badgers. On the other hand, Minnesota’s pass defense has been below average against every team since game one at Syracuse.”
This is really shallow analysis, IME. In at least the State game, the Spartans were playing from behind, and passed almost exclusively in the second half. Passing on every down is guaranteed to generate some yardage, regardless of how successful (efficient) the passing game actually is.
Passing on every down
is guaranteed to generate yardage if you make completions, don’t get intercepted, and don’t have three-and-outs. Basically, passing on every down generates yardage if in fact the defense cannot stop the passing attack.
Buck Bravo
Wisconsin ranks near the bottom on quality of Passing Offenses Faced
111th out of 120. Apparently, Michigan St and Fresno St are not considered to top passing teams (statistically).
PASS OFFENSES FACED
106. Miami, Fl
107. Kansas St
108. WKU
109. Miss St
110. Ohio
111. Wisconsin
112. Boston College
113. Baylor
114. W Michigan
115. Pittsburgh
116. E Michigan
117. USF
118. Iowa St
119. Duke
120. Louisiana Tech
Rushing Defense
Both teams are very good in this aspect but Minn is slightly better. Here are the rankings of quality of competition each has faced with respect to Rush Offenses
RUSH OFFENSES FACED
1. Miami, Fl
2. Ohio St
3. San Jose St
4. Clemson
5. Minnesota
6. Washington
7. Notre Dame
8. Temple
9. Wisconsin
10. Louisiana Tech
11. E Michigan
12. LSU
13. Ohio
14. Kentucky
15. Maryland
16. Purdue
17. New Mexico
18. Virginia
19. FIU
20. Virginia Tech

by 












