Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Stan Van Gundy Fired As Head Coach Of The Magic

Minnesota Golden Gopher Coaching Candidate Profile - Mike Leach

Leach_2_mediumLet's kick off the profiles with Mike Leach.  A super popular candidate within Gopher Nation is the exiled former Texas Tech coach who ended the Glen Mason Era.  The question is rarely will he succeed here, it is more about would he even get hired by this administration.

Playing and Coaching Career

  • no playing career
  • 1987 - Cal-Poly Assistant
  • 1988 - College of the Desert Assistant
  • 1989 - Pori Bears (Swedish football)
  • 1989-91 - Iowa Wesleyan (OC)
  • 1992-96 - Valdosta State (OC)
  • 1997-98 - Kentucky - OC
  • 1999 - Oklahoma (OC)
  • 2000-09 - Texas Tech

What stands out about Mike Leech is that he is one of just five coaches who did not play college football.  That means he does not have the benefit of playing at a high profile school which leads to a graduate assistant role and can jump start a career in college coaching.  He graduated from BYU and then worked his way up from the very bottom of the coaching ranks all the way to a Big 12 head coaching job winning Big12 Coach of the Year in 2008.

Why He Fits

He is a very (VERY) smart, offensive minded football coach.  He often wins by out-scheming and out-coaching his opponent with his Air Raid Offense that puts up a lot of yards and a lot of points.  Gopher fans remember all-to-well how potent a Leach led offense can be.  While I'm not necessarily a huge fan of a  wide open passing attack, Leach has proven to be very effective with it at the highest levels.

When looking back at his tenure at Texas Tech he took a program that had won on average just over 6 wins per year in the 10 years prior to Leach taking over and he turned them into a program that averaged 8.5 wins per year in his 10 years on the job.  Offensively over those 10 seasons they averaged 37 ppg and 482 yards per game both ranked in the top three in the Big Twelve every season but his first.  It is a unique system that scores often and quickly.  Time of possession doesn't mean much in this offense it is all about points.  Defensively they never ranked at the top of the Big 12 but on average they outscored their opponent by nearly 12 ppg over his career at TT.

The offensive stats and the wins is all you really need to know about his resume and is reason enough to at the very least consider him for the Gopher job.  The accepted philosophy of football at all levels is you have to be able to run the ball and stop the run to win.  Mike Leach turned that around and was successful with the philosophy that he can pass the ball at will and he'll do his best to slow down your passing game while you try to run the ball.  He has big time name recognition that would at least get him into recruit's living rooms.  He's proven he can win and that is all that matters.

Lastly he makes a great fit because he's available and could hit the ground running in early December.  The opportunity to have two full months of recruiting is a rarity for brand new coaches.  Of the available coaches who are currently unemployed he is easily the best candidate.

Why He May Not Fit

He has no ties to Minnesota, the Big Ten or even the Midwest.  Not to mention his personality and unorthodox approach to football may not fit in well with the University's administration. Other than the opportunity to coach again at a BCS school there is really nothing compelling about Minnesota for Mike Leech (I assume) so there really is no guarantee that he has any desire to take this job.  He has to understand that this would be a much tougher job than Texas Tech considering he would not have the recruiting base he had in Texas.

Secondly, but probably most important, is how his Texas Tech tenure ended.  The allegations of mistreating a player with a concussion (who just happened to be the son of an ESPN analyst) was too much for the Texas Tech administration.  Would the usually timid Minnesota administration be willing to overlook those past transgressions and hire Leech?  History would suggest that they do not have the stomach for someone even remotely controversial.  Typically the U's administration is much more comfortable with mediocrity than taking a risk at possibly being a big time program.

Many Gopher fans are split on Leech.  Nearly all would agree that he is able to win and he is an offensive mastermind.  So the split really comes on whether or not he'd work in Minnesota.  Half of the people you talk to say he's a genius and would win anywhere, get him here now.  The rest would either tell you that he'll never get hired here so why bother or that he'd struggle a bit more here without the Texas recruiting base.

TDG Approval

Experience - A
Proven Winner - A
Minn/B10 Ties - D-
Recruiting - B-

Mike Leach is a football smarty-pants.  He knows schemes, wide receiver route trees and how to run and offense that puts the defense in compromising situations.  He can produce system quarterbacks that put up a lot of yards and offenses that put up a lot of points.  He had one incredible season in 2008 that was sandwiched by a few very good seasons.

It will be harder to win at Minnesota than it was at Texas Tech.  Largely because he won't have that recruiting base in his back yard.  Clearly he has some Texas connections and some recruiting equity built up down there that he is capable of getting players to the next level.  But even while leading a successful program within the boarders of arguably the most fertile recruiting ground in the country he didn't put together any recruiting classes that were guru ranked all that high.  In the eight years of recruiting rankings I can find his highest class was #25 in 2006, virtually all the rest of his recruiting classes ranked in the mid to upper 40s.  That isn't all that impressive considering he resided within the friendly recruiting borders of Texas.  I fully recognize that recruiting rankings don't mean nearly as much as the coach's ability to put kids in position to succeed.  But even the pool of kids who are under the radar that Leach can identify as potential sleepers is just so much smaller here.  The margin for error would be slimmer.

I can see the lure of Leach and I believe at the very least he'd be more successful here than the previous seven or eight coaches.  Personally I'm not a huge fan of going with the air raid offense but I can see the appeal.  I'd get on board with the Leach hire 100% because it at least shows me that the U was serious about getting somebody in here to win.  My guess is that there will be enough boosters who want a guy like Leach that he'll be contacted through back channels to gauge his interest, but he'll be too controversial to actually get an interview.  Maybe I'm wrong (this is all total guesswork) but the current administration has never shown they would take a risk like this.  So I'd be excited about the hire but I don't believe it is worth the time to get too excited about it.

Comment 52 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There needs to be a strong Lubbockian adjustment factor for Leach’s recruiting at Tech. That’s, what, at best the third-easiest program to recruit to even within the state of Texas? Maybe fourth or fifth?

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 12:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Exactly.

Texas, A&M, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and who knows where else are on top of TTU on the totem pole.

Everyone fails. The successful learn from their failures. I just wish we'd quit giving ourselves so many learning opportunities.

by WhiteSpeedReceiver on Oct 18, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

For the record, I want to bear Mike Leach’s children. So anything I say on this matter is a bit suspect.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

that's kind of my point

it’s not like recruiting at Minnesota is going to be easier than it was at TT.

if we are putting out recruiting excuses for him while at a Big 12 school in Texas, that was winning a lot of games then what is it going to be like recruiting here?

I’m not down on the guy but I’m not adjusting his recruiting for anything. Even being 3rd on the Texas pecking order he still had WAY more recruits within his borders than he’ll have here within a five state area.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 18, 2010 12:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

I quite disagree. We’ll see soon enough that even a big SEC name like Tuberville can’t get better than middling talent into the middle of nowhere West Texas. Big city is a big deal; I don’t buy the argument that this program is harder to sell than any but three or four others in the conference.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I should probably actually read everything you typed. B- is, I think, pretty close to fair. I might call it a B. I’m not suggesting recruiting is his major strength.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tubberville

already has 4, four-star commitments. Leach’s best year was five of them in 2009 after his 11-1 season.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 18, 2010 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't agree that he had a Texas advantage...

Lubbuck is dreadful. There are probably 30 BCS programs outside of Texas that most Texas kids would rather play for.

I do assume, however, that he’ll have some Texas recruiting contacts that would give Minnesota a presence there worth 3-5 recruits per year (think second-tier Texas recruits who became college studs at non-Texas schools like Todd Reesing & Chase Daniels).

I also assume that offensive HS players would usually find some appeal in playing in that type of offense.

So I don’t assume that he’ll be a recruiting wiz, but that he’ll have similar recruiting success to what he had at Texas Tech.

by foobee on Oct 18, 2010 10:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also...

…I’m concerned that you didn’t grade his meteorological abilities.

by GoAUpher on Oct 18, 2010 12:51 PM CDT reply actions  

One more time

I will say Leach is a terrible fit for the U of M. I just don’t get the appeal of this guy up there. I don’t have anything good to say about him so will leave it at that. And my negative opinion has nothing to do with Craig James’ kid.

by Texas Gopher on Oct 18, 2010 1:18 PM CDT reply actions  

More on recruiting...

I’m not gonna be swayed AT ALL about his lack of track-record in signing 4-Star recruits. First of all, it’s a fact that Brewster signed 2X the 4-Star recruits than Mason signed in his entire Gopher tenure. How did that go over in Minny?

Secondly, Leach seems like a classic “Recruit players to fit your system” type of guy." So I’m not sweating rivals and scout.com ratings if he comes to Minnesota…

by foobee on Oct 18, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

also kind of my point

it is MUCH easier to find guys that fit your system when there are hundreds of D1 players in your border. In Minnesota there are a handful of D1 players.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 19, 2010 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

He has Swedish football experience?

Hire him immediately

"If the world were perfect, it wouldn't be." - Yogi Berra

by mnbrewer on Oct 18, 2010 2:17 PM CDT reply actions  

Erik T and Texas Gopher

are perfect examples of how Gopher fans are so split on Leach.

Erik would give his kidney for Leach and Texas would kick him in the kidney. :)

Seriously though I have a feeling that the influential boosters are equally as split on ML.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 18, 2010 2:20 PM CDT reply actions  

He actually wouldn’t be my ideal choice; I have slight but nonzero concerns about that style of football in this type of weather. I would love to wave my magic wand and get Patterson (or, you know, Zombie Bear Hayes Christ), but I think we all agree that such a profile would be a less-than-productive use of your time.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Program standards

Unless I’m remembering wrong, he actually did a good job at TTU improving this aspect for them. He took them from one of the lowest graduation rates to the top of the Big XII.

Not sure if that’s an issue that you really care about, but it is a positive off the field point.

Es gibt keine Freude wie Schadenfreude

by Seer on Oct 18, 2010 2:21 PM CDT reply actions  

It's something the administration probably cares about

Maybe even too much. But I’m guessing the boosters who have given a lot of money to fund a losing program would put winning higher on the list.

"If the world were perfect, it wouldn't be." - Yogi Berra

by mnbrewer on Oct 18, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have to ask...

but what about defense? How do you think TTU’s pass heavy offenses would fare in a conference where defense seems to come first? (honest question)

by edr247 on Oct 18, 2010 2:30 PM CDT reply actions  

actually

his defenses were OK. His pass defense was usually right around 5th in Big 12. Rush defense was bad but I think that played into his philosophy. He’d let teams run but it would take longer drives to score and they’d make mistakes before they’d usually score. His pass defense was pretty good and that let to ultimately what mattered most. Offensive PPG was +12 over his Defensive points allowed.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 18, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

There’s the additional facet of TTU games usually having so, so many possessions. Of course, if you feel confident that you can outscore you opposition on a per-drive basis, it is to your advantage to have as many possessions as possible to minimize per-game variance. The antithesis of the 7-7 game in which the last team to snatch the ball may get to bumble down the field and kick the hail mary field goal.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Please Please Please

Gawd I hope the Gophers have that defensive philosophy no matter who they bring in!!!

Mark 8:36

by lonebadger on Oct 18, 2010 5:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Leach is a lawyer, right?

If he gets hired, he might be my “in” into college football coaching.

Hire the guy now.

by JG2112 on Oct 18, 2010 2:39 PM CDT reply actions  

A few additional factors

It’s been shown previously that big city or not it’s hard to get warm climate kids to Minnesota, which could mean he wouldn’t be luring anyone up from Texas based on past results.
As mnbrewer pointed out, however, Leach’s time coaching in Sweden would mean he’d have a total lock on Minnesota recruits from Day 1. :^)
There’s also the potential “thanks for letting me get back on my feet, I’m off to the SEC” factor with a guy like Leach. I’m starting to think Minnesota may really need a Pat Fitzgerald sort of guy who’d have no real desire to leave immediately after achieving any success. I’d settle for a turnaround/escape artist if that’s all we can get, but the program’s way down right now – why not give it to someone who’s happy to be patient and build it the right way and will be invested enough not to bolt for greener pastures afterwards? Of course that likelihood is pretty difficult to judge in advance.
There’s also a karmic factor at play w/r/t Leach – had it not been for him, we’d probably still have Mason right now. Not that that was completely satisfactory, of course, but in hindsight he sure looks a lot better than he did about 4 years ago.

by MCA1 on Oct 18, 2010 2:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Leach certainly must have had exciting suitors visiting him in Lubbock after his first five or six or seven years of success at TTech. I don’t see why a person who would stay in Lubbock would be excited to leave Minneapolis.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Leach isn't a job-hopper

he just wants to be somewhere that allows him to do things his way. If Minnesota’s AD gives him carte blanche he would stay in the Cities as long as you would have him.

Less memorable than Sam Okey's Hawkeye career.

by Kyle McCann't on Oct 18, 2010 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your correct

With Mike Leach you will need to give him freedom but it’s a worthy cause if you want to win. I think Mike would be happy in any qualifying conference but no less.

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Oct 18, 2010 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Evil wizards like Fitz...

…don’t grow on trees. One reason he’s so solid there is because he’s a Northwestern alum/hero. The choices from our own history are more limited. I agree that the ideal should be to get an Alvarez who sticks around and builds the program up, but the U shouldn’t pass on a great hire because the guy might leave. That mean’s we’re winning.

by GoAUpher on Oct 18, 2010 3:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good points, both of you

I suspect that, despite the Lubbock factor, there are some advantages to coaching (what you made into) the second best college football team in Texas that might make it harder to just leave, vs. coaching a college team in a very deep conference in a pro sports town. But you’re right, it’s not like he bolted as soon as he could have from TT. I remain somewhat skeptical, but not overly so – he’s a former anointed one who could use the U as a reputation rehab point for something else, or he might be grateful and set up camp for good. Like I said, it’s awfully hard to anticipate what might happen with these guys, so it probably shouldn’t be a huge factor unless it’s blatantly obvious we’re being treated as a stepping stone.

As for Fitz, you’re certainly right that Minnesota doesn’t have a home grown product like him – in large part because they haven’t had even short bursts of success like NU did in the mid-‘90s to grow those guys. Alvarez is another good example, but it was just too painful to bring him up yet again. I’m so tired of being jealous of Wisconsin’s athletic success despite their zero inherent advantages over Minnesota.

Anyway, it’s painful to be at the point where we need to be happy to get someone who might do well enough to be offered jobs elsewhere. That’s what MAC teams should be shooting for.

by MCA1 on Oct 18, 2010 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why do so many folks care if a good coach comes then bolts for greener pastures in 2-3 years?

We are beggars. Therefore, we cannot be choosers. Wouldn’t it be a GOOD problem if we hired a coach who immediately turned the program around SO much that he had opportunities to go a big-time program?

I mean, that would HAVE to mean that this guy would put together 1-2 really good years, right? I mean… wouldn’t you guys just be happy to experience winning football for once?

Having a short-lived, but successful run would be the last thing I’d be concerned about in the hiring of a new coach.

by foobee on Oct 18, 2010 10:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Holtz

All goes back to Lou Holtz, he came started to turn the program around and then bolted quickly leaving us with 25 more bad years. I just don’t think anyone thinks the Gophers can make 2 good hiring choices in a row, so it is up, then way back down. Maybe get a guy like Mason to bring it up a little…but then Brewster to bring it back down to good old Wacker days.

by GopherEric on Oct 19, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

You mean like Lou Holtz?

He took off before accomplishing anything in the Twin Cities, and left us with nothing. Continuity and building a program with an identity that can sell itself are worthwhile goals, and ones less likely to be achieved if you become college football’s analogue to Tulsa or Southern Illinois basketball. There’s no guarantee that someone who came in and did really well, then bolted, would leave any sort of foundation or momentum behind. He most likely wouldn’t even leave a successor behind, as he’d take his most talented assistants with him.

I’m not saying that it wouldn’t be fun to have a couple years of great success in short order, but that that kind of party can lead to a nasty hangover. This is why I’d be pretty leery of guys like Golden. He may never be offered the Penn State job, but then again, he might, and we could be right back where we started if he hasn’t been in Minnesota long enough to really establish anything.

by MCA1 on Oct 19, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I want to be a beggar and a chooser

get us a guy who wins and stays. Winning for two years and then bolting really leaves us in the exact same place we are now. You don’t get a big recruiting bump for the program winning for two years and then that coach leaving.

Look at Cincy. They are 3-3 (beating Ind St and Miam(OH) for two of those wins), after Brian Kelly left.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 19, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

This dude lost me...

…when he used the discredited 9 million dollar FB budget figure AND listed DeWayne Walker and Marc Trestman as the 2 guys the Gophers should be going after.

by GoAUpher on Oct 18, 2010 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Really? For me it was calling Dungy the “most respected man in America”. I guess I didn’t make it as far down as you did.

At this point, DeWayne Walker could use a kick in the balls better than he could use another program to lead to the depths of insanity.

by Erik T on Oct 18, 2010 3:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Budget, coaches and Dungy

The U budget is simply an “expenses” report, nothing more. In any event, no matter how you take the numbers, or whether you believe them, there is a huge discrepancy from top to bottom.

Walker and Trestman should be the targets, yes. There is no way there will be a big name coach on his way. Leach? Yeah, right. The two I mention are the two plausible candidates — heck, Walker’s probably not even feasible. I stated a wish list, but believe this is the general direction the school would be comfortable with.

Dungy isn’t among the most respected people in the country? The guy gets a verbal reach around every three days from ESPN, NBC and random bloggers and commentators across America. I’m not the biggest Dungy fan in the world, but he had to be mentioned and I don’t think I was off in calling what I see.

St. Cloud Gopher

by StCloudGopher on Oct 18, 2010 5:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Leach

Who knows if Mike Leach is actually interested in coaching again? He seems to have fallen off the map. His lawyer backround would help him defend himself against the administration here.

by bobbyspringfield on Oct 18, 2010 4:16 PM CDT reply actions  

From Dennis Dodds' blog on CBSSports.com on Leach and the Minnesota job

http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/6270202/25321633

The former Texas Tech coaching star kind of expressed his interest in the Minnesota job on his Sirius satellite radio show Monday morning.

Asked by the host specifically about the Minnesota job Leach said, “I’m in a position to listen to anybody.”

Leach’s name immediately popped up after Tim Brewster was fired on Sunday after 3 1/2 seasons. Minnesota AD Joel Maturi reportedly pursued Tony Dungy who declined but then offered his help in the search.

Leach is in the process of dealing with his lawsuit against his old employer, Texas Tech. Other than that, he’s one of the hottest coaching properties out there — a proven commodity armed with plenty of pirate history.

Message boards and Twitter have lit up with the names of some outlandish replacements for Brewster. Jim Harbaugh? Gary Patterson, Chris Petersen? C’mon, get real. More realistic candidates include Vikings DC Leslie Frazier and San Diego State head coach Brady Hoke.

The program hasn’t finished above fourth place in the Big Ten since 1986 and hasn’t beaten a ranked team since 2005.

“You’re not following Vince Lombardi here,” AD Joel Maturi said.

“I haven’t given it much thought,” Leach continued. “But it’s a good program, it’s in the Big Ten.”

by Jeffrick on Oct 18, 2010 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

He tweeted something to the effect of...

…“Don’t they know they’re Minnesota?” earlier today. That plus his Tubby to Auburn crap this spring is enough for me to tune him out. I’m not saying he doesn’t have a partial point as our football brand isn’t spotless, but there is a reason the U hired the bigshot headhunter with impeccable credentials for discreet backchannel inquiries…The U is going to think big and pursue some big name hires. With Neinas, they can afford to hear some “no’s” without it causing a public stir. With luck, we’ll hear a yes from a good candidate along the way.

by GoAUpher on Oct 18, 2010 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Leach

You guys would be so lucky to have this guy as your head coach. I’m thinking he’s a better fit at Colorado but keep your fingers crossed. Minn. is probably a step down for Leach but definitely a place where he can only progress seeing where the program has been. Good luck!

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Oct 18, 2010 5:07 PM CDT reply actions  

Leach

It won’t happen, but if it did it would be an absolute coup for the Gophers.

Leach is a winner, he has been successful everywhere he’s been. Everyone knows about TTech, but don’t forget what he did for Tim Couch at Kentucky, and Josh Heupel in just 1 year at Oklahoma.

Leach would be an immediate difference maker.

And I’m sorry, but anyone crying about how his style won’t work in the “defensive-minded” Big12Ten needs to get with the present. Styles of football evolve, and frankly the BigTen has been slow to adapt. It now has a reputation of being slow and plodding, deserved or not, it has clearly been passed up in overall level of play by the SEC and the Pac10.

Additionally, the Gophers need an innovative system to compete, because they will never have a level of talent equal to the top of the conference, no matter how great of a “recruiter” a coach supposedly is.

by tobygardenhire on Oct 18, 2010 6:46 PM CDT reply actions  

That last sentence...

…is what has been so frustrating with Brewster. We do need an innovative (or at least contrarian) style of play. Brewster had it and it was working (our offense wasn’t the problem in 2007) for the first two years. Suddenly he changes everything and starts from scratch (coaches and players to fit the system) in 2009. That was his demise—going away from the spread. Weber actually ran the offense well until we tried to make him a pocket passer. We didn’t have a pocket passer on the depth chart, nor a power running back for the run heavy offense we adopted this year.

Wrong personnel. Wrong coaches. No leadership. Brewster fired.

by rencito on Oct 18, 2010 7:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Leach’s style of offense would make you guys competitive. I would venture to say that 3 years in and he would have you guys competing with the traditional Big 10 powers such as Mich. and Ohio State. The guys knows how to work around defenses and score loads of points. The Tech administration is who screwed us but most fans and alumni in Texas would kill to have him back at the helm. The Big 12 south may be the toughest division in football and Leach made Tech competitive to likes of OU and UT which is no small task.

"You've got to find your inner pirate" - Mike Leach

by Raider1992 on Oct 18, 2010 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Forget Leach.

Jeff Horton has exactly what the Gopher football program needs:

http://jeffhorton.com/

by Grady The Badger on Oct 18, 2010 7:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Wow that's magical

I had no idea Jeff Horton the OC was capable of such things.

by Jeffrick on Oct 18, 2010 7:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

that was awesome

comment of the day (for yesterday).

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Oct 19, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Lubbock

I’m really happy y’all are looking at Leach. My current roommates’ a former Gopher, and I’d love to see Minnesota out of the bottom of the barrel. He definitely brought a cult atmosphere to Tech football… we’re idiots for letting him go (I could ramble for hours).

One thing though… what’s with all the Lubbock bashing? No, it’s not Austin, Dallas, San Antonio or Houston (Texas has 3 of the 10 largest cities in the US), but it’s not as country-bumpkin as you might think. The population is around 230,000, and the city’s not too bad. It’s definitely not as bad College Station, Stillwater, Lawrence, Lincoln, Norman, Columbia, Manhattan (KS) or Ames…

Anyway, good luck Gophers, we’d all love to see Leach coaching somewhere.

by jordandrum on Oct 19, 2010 10:36 PM CDT reply actions  

Because Lubbock is a 6 hour drive from any sizeable city

200,000+ people or not, that, my friend, is the very definition of BFE. Manhattan, for instance, is an hour and a half from KC, so there’s at least the possibility of heading up the road for a Chiefs game or whatever. Ames is about as close to Chicago as Lubbock is to Dallas. Whatever Lubbock can provide is all there is. Which is fine, and I’m sure it’s a nice small city with lots of good people who love it there, but for a college football coach making a couple mil a year, there’s probably not a ton there to spend your money on. That’s not enough people to support much of an arts or music scene, more than a couple legitimate restaurants, or a bunch of nice golf courses. Touring Broadway productions don’t drop in for a month and I’d be shocked if the concert schedules of anyone other than country musicians includes Lubbock. But, whatever – TT was enough of a draw to get Mike Leach and Bobby Knight down there, and Leach stayed awhile, so it’s not like having the amenities of a big city are a requisite for everyone.

FWIW, San Antonio as a metropolitan area doesn’t even crack the top 25, sitting behind even Orlando. As a municipality, it’s high on the population list simply because it’s annexed all its suburbia, like Jacksonville and Indianapolis.

by MCA1 on Oct 20, 2010 9:59 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minnesota Golden Gophers sports--Usually analytical, sometimes snarky.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

47487
B1G Conference FB schedules for 2015 and 2016 released
Daily_logo_small
What does the Vikings stadium deal mean for Gopher football?
47487
B1G Homecoming Kickoff Times announced
83217-125958-hawkeye_super_small
Gophers Host a Kegger!
47487
Big Ten announces prime-time TV schedule
47487
President Kaler announces VCU athletic director as AD finalist
Small
Hoops Season In Review
Small
Gophers Hockey Preview
Small
Frozen Four Preview
Small
Gophers 2013 Basketball Prospectus

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mn_basketball_small GopherNation

Imagescary7xfo_small Jeffrick

Img-20101223-00043_small JDMill

Editors

Imgres_small PJS

Bigbuck_small Buck Bravo

Dsc02076_small JG2112