Plenty of Blame to go Around in White Saga
Let's start with a hearty round of applause for City Attorney Susan Segal (Senator Amy Klobuchar's former deputy) for changing a young man's life because he, like millions of other students every year on every college campus around the country, entered another student's dorm room. You see, apparently Royce White is not guilty for what he's been punished for the past months. He didn't steal anyone's laptop. But he was room-hopping at the University of Minnesota and since he's a student-athlete of some prominence, Susan Segal and her publicity-seeking cronies have to charge White with something, even if it's a trumped up charge that if applied equally would mean half of the U's student body would be facing misdemeanor charges.
The overzealous prosecution being put forward by Susan Segal is a travesty. It's a joke. Your tax dollars are going to work to have a young man judged because he went room to room looking to see where the party was. Can't have that in a college dormitory!
But Segal isn't the only villain in this story. She's just the one that is currently using the high profile of White to make a name for herself.There's plenty of blame to go around.
I, for one, am not pointing fingers at Royce White. Here we have a teenager who seems to have made one mistake, albeit a large one in his theft and assault episode at the Mall of America. But that is now in White's past. He's admitted his mistake and he's since went on to excel in the classroom at the U, something many of us thought he might not be able to do and Al Nolen has failed to do. I refuse to blame a teenager for making one mistake.
But throughout this entire saga, White has seemed to lack the type of support one would expect from University officials. Coach Tubby Smith has developed a reputation over the years that he's a coach that cares about his kids. He's a fatherly figure that will groom young men for adulthood. The attributes of Smith's skill-set that have led to such praise have been absent during this melodrama. When White was justifiably charged and eventually pled guilty to the assault charges, I can understand Smith's reluctance to get involved. Smith did the right thing by indefintely suspending White. But since that's been cleared and this bogus charge comes from Susan Segal and company, Smith's continued silence has been disheartening.
Put yourself in White's shoes. He screwed up. He paid his dues and then some in a very public ordeal. And then he's accused of something he didn't do--steal a laptop--and then when Susan Segal trumps up a trespassing charge to grab some headlines, White could justifiably feel targeted. It would have been nice for White, in this most recent dust-up with the legal system, had the fatherly-figure Smith risen to stand by his side. But Smith has been silent and apparently refused to let White play. Just recently it's been reported that Smith never intended for White to play this season. I'm actually fine with that decision, but the problem is Smith never thought it was necessary to share his sage decision with White. When you have a kid who's heart is breaking because he can't play and you give him a glimmer of hope that he will soon, I think it is Smith's responsibility to be open and honest with White as to where he stands.
That never seems to have happened, but it's status quo for everyone involved in this fiasco to drag their feet.
And the award for the worst investigation ever goes to the University Police Department for taking far too long to decide if White should be charged with theft in the laptop ordeal. He either stole the laptop or he didn't. After weeks (months?) go by with just speculation while White's name is turned into mud, Susan Segal's cabal levels the trespassing charge because, well, at that point you have to charge the kid with something to justify the University Police decision to toss around accusations at him that were untrue.
And a special bit of blame goes to University Police Chief Greg Hestness. His department's inability to allow White to clear his name in a timely manner is a travesty. If Hestness' job wasn't already in jeopardy, it should be after the quote he just gave the Star Tribune. In White's announcement yesterday, White suggested he was fearful of a "irresponsible" police department. From the article, this is Hestness responding to White's statements:
University Police Chief Greg Hestness said White's claims strike him as "incredible." Police have had two conversations with him, one of which included his lawyer, Hestness said.
"I'm not sure how he forms that opinion," he said. "Secondly, he doesn't strike me as a fearful person."
Hestness added: "I hope he finds his way."
First of all, I hope Hestness' department finds a way to investigate on-campus thefts in even a sort-of timely manner in the future. All that is riding on such things is a student's life, no big deal.
Worse, Hestness' comments about White not striking him as a fearful person are borderline racist. He's met with the kid twice and he's jumping to conclusions. Why does he not strike Hestness as fearful? Is it because he's tall and black and can apparently string sentences together to defend himself against a trumped of charge? Could it be that White feels targeted? Could it be that he feels he was thrown into the limelight by Greg Hestness and company because he's a basketball player?
Since it doesn't look like Hestness or his comrades have any evidence to back-up their allegation that White stole someone's laptop, will there be repercussions for Hestness and his colleagues for dragging their feet on an investigation that sullied the reputation and dramatically changed the life of a college student?
Somehow I doubt it, because the Royce White meme goes something like this: He's a troubled kid who had issues in high school and got himself into trouble at the Mall of America. Anything that happens after that, it must be the kid's fault because the adults in the ordeal--Susan Segal, Greg Hestness, Tubby Smith and Joel Maturi--surely handled this situation with class, honesty and integrity. Or something.
0 recs |
38 comments
|
Comments
I love Tubby...
but I am getting tired of him saying NOTHING about the mess. At least give some kind of opinion or tell us how you FEEL. He doesn’t have to give us much, but how about something, anything.
"they're calling insane hogs???"
the only thing I disagree with is your Tubby assessment
I think the fact that he let White start practicing says volumes. Before the new year he had said that White had some growing up to do before he’d be allowed back with the team. After seeing that White was working hard in the classroom and I presume that he was convinced White had matured, he let him come back to practicing with the team. I think that was a big show of support that not only were the legal matters in an OK place but that Tubby believed White was ready to be back with the team.
I completely agree that White would have been better served and shown support had Tubby come out and said something (anything), especially once he was back to practicing with the team. But I don’t believe it has been a total lack of support from the coaching staff.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you
Expectations.
White seems to have thought he has served his time and was going to be able to play again. Coach Smith, while I might even agree with his decision not to play WHite, doesn’t seem to have relayed that to White and he definetly hasn’t until recently said that publicly.
I’m speculating that White turns to basketball as an escape when he feels lost in other parts of his life. I know I did growing up. Smith has basically taken that away from him. And it was the right move by Smith to take that away from him after the MoA incident. But now it’s overkill. Smith should be standing up for Royce at this point.
GN, I agree that letting him practice was a big move on Tubby’s part. But Tubby could have coupled that with a statement about White’s grades, how he’s bearing down, how he’s a good kid—something to demonstrate to White he has people on his side.
I’m just disappointed in this whole ordeal.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
he did...
Tubby said that the reason why Royce was practicing was because his grades were so good. He said that two weeks ago.
the university made him shoplift? the university made him walk into someones room uninvited? They made him run those youtube videos? quit the basketball team the first time? and now they are making him quit school? you’ve got to be kidding me.
The U has had a stance from the beginning, he doesn’t play until his legal issues are resolved. as of right now his legal issues are still unresolved, therefore he does not play.
Don’t make excuses for White’s behavior, remember the U is paying for his education RW needs to conduct himself better no questions asked.
I for one am wondering where are his parents? Where is his family support network? Where are the people that should be advising this kid on what to say and when to say it? Where are those people?
Tubby wasn’t clear, however, on when White would play, if at all this season, until an article this week. Heck, even brother GN speculated in a game preview recently that White might play. There seemed to be confusion publicly on that count.
No one is blaming the U for White shoplifting from MOA. And White certiainly erred with his YouTube videos, a byproduct I’d suggest has a lot to do with the fact that he probably doesn’t have a support network. He could have been delivered that support network from Tubby’s staff.
Even most Royce haters seem to agree this latest dust-up with the legal system is, at best, a bit of a stretch. I agree that he doesn’t need to play until this is resolved, but how about some support publicly from the coaching staff or administration? He’s a teenager fighting what looks to be an overzealous prosecution. Of course he’s going to screw up like he did with the YouTube stuff if he doesn’t have that support around him.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 2, 2010 1:54 PM CST up reply actions
i don't know
that is excusing alot of bad actions on Royce’s part.
Make no mistake I would love for Royce to be playing right now this team is instantly better as soon as he suits up, but they said from day one that he wouldn’t play until his legal issues were resolved. oddly there seems to be no confusion about trevor even though the same stipulations were put on him.
Well ....
When you’re a teenage athlete and the media from ESPN to the local rags are framing you as a bad egg, some public support could be beneficial.
Something like, “We’ve spent time with Royce White in the past months as he’s suffered the consequences and learned from his mistake at the Mall of America. We’ve taken proactive measures and suspended Royce from playing with the team. Since that incident we’ve been impressed with Royce’s ability to stay the course and excel in the classroom. We know it has been difficult for Royce to be faced with a second public legal situation. But we intend to stand by Royce as he goes through this very public process and will work with him not just to be a better basketball player, but student and young man as well.”
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 2, 2010 3:02 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not sure what you're asking about.
The paragraph I put in quotes above was the type of public statement I think the U could have issued to demonstrate its support for White during the months-long investigation by the slow-moving UMPD.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 2, 2010 7:39 PM CST up reply actions
I am asking in general
More specifically, do you know that RW is doing things behind the scenes to make Tubby and the Athletic Department want to show public support?
I think you are also forgetting how Tubby supported him in the past. He could have pulled his scholarship offer last year, but didn’t. That’s a pretty strong show of support in my mind. Frankly, I tend to think Tubby and the U stood by him, gave him a second chance, and perhaps now have regrets, perhaps for good reason. That’s why I say, sometimes they have to earn those extra chances.
You seem to think the UMPD has a vendetta against RW because he is an athlete. If so, why haven’t these issues surfaced in the past? I’ve heard the tapes of Clem trying to cover up what his players did, this isn’t the first time UMPD has investigated an athlete. Usually things blow over quickly, why not this time?
Goes back to when Clem was here
Was played on KQ92 back around 1998/99. Can’t remember for sure, but I think it was around the time a player was on trial for assaulting (??) a woman. Clem was talking to the woman while she secretly recorded the conversation. I do know the names and what was said, but since it has been so long I am weary of writing something a little out of context.
I have probably given you enough info to find what you want on Google.
Who else was charged?
White was not by himself in walking through the dorm according to some of the reports… Why hasn’t anyone else been charged then? It’s because they don’t offer the prosecutor any publicity if they bust Joe Q. Student and charge him.
You have stumbled on to exactly why this has dragged on!
I won’t give you the answer but keep thinking about what you just wrote. Put yourself in the shoes of a detective or prosecutor…it’s so simple if you put two and two together.
A hint…Instead of looking for the conspiracy, ask yourself what else the cops might be trying to gain by holding this over RW’s head!
Couple responses
On a vendetta, I haven’t suggested that. What i have suggested is that once the UMPD’s way too long investigation into the laptop theft resulted in apparently no evidence White was guilty the authorities including UMPD and the City Attorney’s office brought forward a bogus charge to save face. And now that White is calling them on it, the UMPD is attacking White in return, belittling his probably honest sentiment that he fears for himself on campus. And, yes, I feel that in this case the UMPD and City Attorney’s office are giving more attention to a trespassion violation then they would for any other non-famous UofM student.
As for the U now having regrets, well Tubby apparently had Royce back at practice recently. If they wanted him out, that wouldn’t have happened. But allowing a kid to practice also isn’t the same sort of public support I believe White needed and didn’t receive.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
Well Done PJS
I think it’s striking to point out that White had been punished for what he was accused of but never charged with .. the laptop. The trespassing charges are such a sham. Along with the lack of support from Maturi in my opinion this is a disgrace to Gopher athletics.
Now, hold on........
…..we don’t know all the facts of these cases. We don’t know the conditions of his prior run-ins with the law.
And I for one am happy that Tubby Smith, unlike Royce White, isn’t trying to tamper a jury pool by trashtalking the police or an investigation on local television.
There was an easy way for Royce White to stay out of trouble. Allegedly, he didn’t do it. Let’s let the criminal justice system work this out before we start laying blame.
His prior run-ins with the law are irrelevant. The MOA incident has been decided. It’s over and in no way should cloud this incident.
And we know plenty about the investigation into the alleged theft of a laptop. We know that Royce and his friends were dorm-room hopping. We know that someone allegedly stole a laptop. We know it wasn’t Royce White because otherwise he would have been charged with that crime instead of simply having his name sullied because he was a suspect.
The criminal justice system has failed White as far as I’m concerned and this is a over-zealous prosecution by Susan Segal to cover the tracks of a police department that put itself into a corner having to charge White with something.
JG, you also seem to think that Royce shouldn’t mount a defense. Certainly a part of his defense can be an inept police department or that he’s being unfairly persecuted. If I were Royce and the University Police had just accused me of stealing a laptop and then it took months for it to come out that he, in fact, didn’t steal said laptop, I’d feel plenty persecuted and fear for my safety from authorities run amok in Dinkytown.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
You may want to look a little deeper into this
It has been reported by major local news media (I’ll say allegedly although they didn’t) that a certain Gopher basketball player was legally banned from the dorm before the season even started.
First off...........
this quote:
His prior run-ins with the law are irrelevant.
is completely wrong. Ever heard of “conditions of parole?” Not saying that he was on parole, mind you.
Second off – White should absolutely mount a defense. He has a terrier for a defense attorney who i’ve worked with in the past in the courts. However, when White goes on television, like he did yesterday, and excoriates the police in the way he did, he’s potentially tampering with the subconscious of people who might be on his jury. It’s wrong, no matter who does it.
And third – he has a right to file a malicious prosecution or section 1983 civil lawsuit when this prosecution is closed. I’m certain his attorney will do so – it’s how criminal defense attorneys make their money (plead the criminal case down to reasonable terms, then sue the police departments in hopes of getting a settlement, or winning a judgment and getting their fees paid for under the 1983 statute).
I’m just spit-balling here, but it seems to be a stretch that White’s conditions of parole would include a banishment from the U’s dormitories. Because that’s all he’s charged with here. And certainly the prosecution and eventually judge can take into account his previous legal record when it comes to placing a punishment on White if his deal on the assault at MOA wasn’t taken off of his record.
I didn’t really follow you the first time you wrote about the “conditions” of his prior run-in, though I see where you’re coming from now. My assertion that his prior run-in is irrelevant has more to do with my belief that the University and the many anti-White crowd should move past the MOA incident which he has admitted to, apologized for and taken a good deal of punishment. And if the MOA incident has caused the U to stay away from WHite when he could use their assistance now (in handling the press and dealing with all of this in a productive way), then I think the U is making a mistake and should help White move on from the MOA affair.
And I disagree that White’s comments yesterday were an attempt to tamper with a jury pool. This is a misdemeanor charge and that’s sort of silly. And if he feels the way he clearly does about being unfairly targeted by UMPD he has every right to include his voice—among the many others who are attacking him—in the court of public opinion. Like it or not, many defense attorney’s will play the public relations game the same way the UMPD or City Attorney has here.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 2, 2010 2:55 PM CST up reply actions
Are you under the impression
the MOA incident is the first negative issue for him? What happened at his first high school??
Of course it wasn't.
But many, many, many high school kids make mistakes. The difference with White is even minor mistakes, at DeLaSalle an academic one, are blown out of proportion because he’s an athlete. On the academic front, it looks like White has that part figured out. It’s not easy to get a 3.3 (I think that’s what it was) in your first semester at the U.
How many of our CEOs, politicians or professors would be where they are today if every mistake they made along the way as teenagers was front page news?
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 2, 2010 7:51 PM CST up reply actions
If you'd really think about the argument you are trying to support
you would see the major flaws it contains. You defend him by saying many kids make mistakes, and his are blown out of proportion because he is an athlete. OK, how many negative stories have you heard about Seantrel Henderson this year???? Or any other high profile metro high school/college athlete. How about Joe Mauer?
Your last point also rings hollow. Talk to any cop or criminal justice person, and they will tell you unless someone is an incredibly stupid criminal, for every time they are caught they have offended dozens of other times without being caught. What does this say about RW, just happened to get caught both times he allegedly committed a crime since arriving at the U of M? Go back to what I posted earlier, according to a reporter at the Star Tribune this may not be the first dorm “incident”. I won’t repeat what I heard the reporter state on the radio, but check around, might be enlightening.
Does everyone make “mistakes”…sure, but why don’t most people get caught or prosecuted. Usually because they rarely make the “mistakes”, and when they do the mistakes are usually minor and easy to miss. I bet 90% of college students never shoplifted a thing in college. I managed to earn a degree from the U without being accused of a crime on campus, even a minor one in a dorm room. I bet most alums can state the same.
Bottom line…Getting caught shoplifting from MOA a few weeks after being put on notice that you are being investigated for stealing a laptop just doesn’t happen to most students, athlete or not.
I'm not even sure what you're saying here.
Royce has made more mistakes then Joe Mauer? OK, you got me. I’m also guessing Joe Mauer and Seantrel Henderson have a more equipped support network.
As for this Star Tribune report you keep mentioning, link to it. But if it’s Myron Medcalf doing the reporting I’m not sure I’ll trust it unless he’s citing a real person as a source.
Do you think that City Attorney Susan Segal would be prosecuting random of UofM student John Doe for this trespassing charge? I just don’t think so.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
I've told you what to look for and ask about
I’m not going to spend hours looking for a link to something I’ve heard said on the radio by a Star Tribune reporter about five times in the past two months. You’re a big boy, you can find it if you desire. If you really want to have an informed opinion on this matter, do yourself a favor and ask around. You might just realize why Tubby isn’t being very supportive.
Might also ask yourself this question….Rumors were spreading for about two weeks that a starter would be ruled academically ineligible. Tubby knew Nolen was struggling but stuck with him and let him play until the end, why would he be treating RW differently?
BTW, you conveniently lock on Joe Mauer and Seantrel Henderson, I also opened it up to any high school/college athlete in the Twin Cities. Not all of them have support networks. Also, why is it only Royce is having these issues with UMPD??? They’ve investigated several football players this year without seeming to have any issues. Why is Royce the only Gopher basketball player having issues with UMPD, are they following other players? I bet if they were really just looking for publicity they could find a couple underage hockey players drinking (or maybe that’s just a Channel 9 thing).
Fail
If you are going to cite a reference to something to support your claim YOU have to find it. You obviously know more about the point you are trying to make than we do. It doesn’t make any sense at all for us to look for something that may not even exist or doesn’t corroborate the point you are trying to make. Throwing out hollow claims without supporting evidence isn’t going to get you very far around here.
I don't CARE if you like it or not!
Here’s the thing, I come to blogs like this looking for info and opinions, also willing to give opinions. What I won’t do is spread rumors…I’ll let people know if they are missing something and where to look, but I won’t repeat things I hear on the radio (said by sportswriters, not the idiot caller who heard something from Uncle Ralphie). The reason I won’t write these things is I don’t want to paraphrase something I heard a week or two earlier, too easy to misquote. I also can’t provide a link because I heard it on the radio, if you know how to link a radio wave let me know, I don’t know how to do it.
I’ve gone as far to say it was a Star Tribune guy (who made the comment several different times), on the radio…how many choices are there? Like I said before, I’m not going to spend hours looking through KSTP or KFAN podcasts just so you can click a button. If you don’t want to believe there is more to this story than a couple mistakes, fine…believe Tubby threw the guy under a bus.
I’ll ask again, if Tubby doesn’t support his players or believe in second chances, why did he let Nolen keep playing until the last possible moment, knowing he was likely to be declared academically ineligible.
I’ll ask this again, if it’s the product of an overambitious prosecutor of UMPD, why haven’t other more notable athletes had the same problem?
THIS ISN’T TUBBY’S FAULT!!!!
First, on Tubby. No one is saying this is his fault. My position is that Tubby could have, maybe should have done more to demonstrate public support for Royce. I accept that some people disagree.
I don’t think Nolen comparison is apples to oranges. Nolen had until whatever set date, correct? So, he might have had time to turn in late work, retake tests, etc. … Furthermore, Tubby is judged at the end of the day on his wins and losses. Having Nolen on the court as long as possible was surely about winning. Why make the kid sit on the sidelines until he has to.
As for the radio piece you mention, I believe what you’re saying. But I don’t live in Minnesota, so I certainly didn’t hear it. And if a reporter is talking about something that newsworthy on the air, I’d bet a pretty penny that his editors at the STrib or PiPress would want the same news to be reported in their respective rags.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 3, 2010 3:49 PM CST up reply actions
Since you live out of town and probably rely
on TV broadcasts and media coverage, perhaps this is partially why I have a differing view on Tubby’s show of support. As a season ticket holder, I see RW sitting on (or just behind) the bench, and also on the floor for team huddles. The fact he was allowed to be there on game day was a public show of support in my eyes, and sent the message that Tubby wanted him to be part of the team.
I don’t really disagree on your Nolen take, but coaches have suspended players who are having academic issues, before the end date, telling them to focus on academics. Monsen did something similar with Pryzbilla.
Support
I agree that Tubby having Royce around is a statement of sorts. However, where I think Royce needed the help was in the public realm. A public statement to be sent to the media. Something for reporters to use in articles about Royce. Because if Tubby is asking Royce and all his freshman to refrain from speaking to the media, the coverage of this stuff is basically going to be anti-troubled young kid.
You seem to follow and support the team. You know when Royce is in practice and when he isn’t. Most people don’t. So in the minds of the public at large, all they know is what they read in the STrib or PiPress.
I think it was the consistently harsh criticism of Royce in the public forum—blogs, forums, comments, radio callers, etc..—that pushed Royce over the edge in some of his unfortunate public statements (youtube videos, quitting…). I believe the kid needed someone to aggressively stand by his side through probably the toughest time of his life. All the U seemed to be wiling to give him was practice time and a seat on the bench. They could have done more to publicly support him. Had they he might still be here.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
On a totally unrelated note
If police or prosecutors were trying to solve a crime, and they felt someone was unwilling to share information that could help solve that crime, do you think they might try to make life a little difficult for the person they thought was being uncooperative to protect his street “cred”.
Would a coach be supportive of a player bringing notoriety to his program instead of cooperating with public officials??
My thoughts
First, Tubby should not get involved in his players’ legal activities. There is absolutely no reason for him to speak out on either side of the issue—he doesn’t know what happened that night any more than we do. He can’t take his player’s side if he might be guilty.
Secondly, Tubby DID come out a month ago voicing his frustrations with how long the legal process was taking for both White and Mbakwe.
Third, it really is out of Tubby’s hands when it comes to White’s playing time. It is the U’s policy that these players aren’t playing—not necessarily Tubby’s.
Fourth, I agree that the evidence against White is flimsy at best, but we don’t know all of the details. From what I have read when this first happened, White’s answers in the beginning were inconsistent with details from other people’s in the crime report and video surveillance of the building. This doesn’t mean that he did it, but it is cause for further investigation and for him to be named as a suspect, or at least knowing the identity of the perpetrator.
Fifth, prior records are, indeed, relevant.
Rencito
A few responses, first to your first two points. I agree that Tubby shouldn’t weigh into their legal situations. He has no business saying someone is guilty or innocent. He’s done enough inn that regard. But, where I see a distinction is Tubby offering public displays of support for White, especially when he’s publicly unraveled. The young man obviously needs support. Tubby could have offered it more publicly, assuming he offered support privately. That would have helped Royce as publicly it’s been him against all of his critics.
To your third point, I agree about White’s playing time and I don’t even think he should play now. But I do think that Tubby could have been more clear about the situation publicly and to Royce to ensure that false expectations weren’t created in Royce’s mind or the public at large as to when he might actually play.
To your fourth point, White’s statements after the laptop incident might have been inconsistent with that of others. But clearly he didn’t steal the laptop or else he’d be charged with that. Couldn’t the inconsistent statements be a result of the others who were involved, including an actual guilty party? We never hear about those people though.
Finally, on prior records, I agree from a legal standpoint to an extent, but also believe the MOA incident which White has payed for could likely be shading the decision making of University officials in 1) pursuing the laptop investigation for months and 2) the lack of public support for White. The kid’s been framed by the mainstream media as a crook afterall, so there’s plenty of risk in even standing by the kid’s side.
Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher
by PJS on Feb 2, 2010 5:55 PM CST up reply actions
Rebuttal
Again, why would/should Tubby put his reputation on the line to “support” someone who may very well be a criminal. Furthermore, why does he have to do this publicly? We don’t know what has gone on in private.
The thing is, I agree with your overall theme here. I don’t believe White is some hardened criminal. He has made some mistakes that are not at all unusual for a teenager. I think he can grow into a better citizen with some maturity. His grades show that he isn’t dumb—he just makes some poor choices as many teenagers do.
I also agree that the trespassing charge is lame. However, I do not think this at all means that he did NOT steal the laptop. It just means that they don’t have enough evidence to get a conviction with that sort of charge. In light of this, they should just drop all charges, but this doesn’t necessarily mean he was innocent and that he is a victim.

by 











