Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How A Letter From Tom Coughlin Helped One Fan's Recovery

Heartbreak at the Buzzer

The Gophers had a chance to upset the #3 ranked Purdue Boilermakers. Devoe Joseph dribbled to the corner with the last seconds tipping away. He pump faked to shake a Purdue defender and had a wide open look to win the game. The shot didn't fall and the Gophers let slip away a game that was handed to them by the basketball Gods.

Everything was going Minnesota's way. Purdue's Robbie Hummel, a great player, left the game late in the first half with what looked like a serious knee injury. He didn't return. Early in the second half, Purdue's Kelsey Barlow rolled his ankle and didn't return for any meaningful action. After Hummel's departure, the Gophers were the better team. They closed a 14 point first half deficit to 7 by the end of the half once Hummel left. The Gophers came out in the second half on fire and quickly turned that deficit into a 9 point lead. Ralph Sampson III and Colton Iverson played great during this stretch. And Minnesota's 3-2 defense forced the Boilermakers to make outside shots, something that without Hummel proved difficult.

But as the second half wore on, Minnesota's momentum slowed. Purdue made quite a few clutch shots, including the game-winner from Keaton Grant who was very big down the stretch. The Gophers also went away from the 3-2 zone during a large stretch in the second half and went away from its inside game that allowed the Gophers to storm back. Neither change in game plan made sense from my perspective.

While the second half come back from Minnesota was fun to watch, and the loss in the final seconds was devastating to us fans, and to Minnesota's NCAA Tournament chances, we should be honest with ourselves that this Minnesota team is not in the same league as Purdue when Hummel is on the floor. Without Hummel, the Gophers might just be a better team. But this game wouldn't have been this close had Hummel played a full 40 minutes. 

The final minutes against Purdue demonstrated again that this Minnesota team doesn't know how to close games. Iverson had the chance to make an easy layup or dunk in the final minute to give Minnesota a 3 point lead. Excited, he rushed the layup and bricked it. Purdue sprinted down the floor and took the lead instead. Next year or the year after, Iverson will make that shot. He'll probably dunk it with authority. But right now, with mostly underclassmen contributing, this Gophers team hasn't yet figured out how to win close games. It's these plays, the easy plays, that you can't waste. The Gophers did throw away this opportunity.

On the positive side, Sampson was tremendous. He was confident. He's scoring with his back-to-the-basket and shooting outside with confidence. He finished with 21 and 7. With him playing so well, my only gripe is that Tubby Smith didn't give him the ball in the final 2 minutes. He was scoring almost at will down the and at the very least getting good looks, even against Purdue's JaJuan Johnson. Purdue's Johnson was very impressive himself, but Sampson was the better player Wednesday night and deserved an opportunity to put this team on his back to finish the game off. 

Continuing with the big guys, I thought Iverson played well despite the miss at the end. He did well on the post and demonstrated an ability to pass out of the post to set up outside shots or easy looks on the inside once the Purdue defense collapsed. He finished with 4 points, 8 rebounds and 2 assists. I thought he was solid and again liked the Gophers best when they played big with Iverson, Sampson and Damian Johnson on the floor. That size advantage allowed the Gophers to play even with Purdue on the glass.

At point guard, Devoe Joseph played a solid game. He took his offense when it was there and protected the ball, committing only one turnover. He shouldn't hold his head down for missing that shot at the end. Blake Hoffarber was a non-factor against Purdue again. Lawrence Westbrook rarely looked for his offense, finishing just with 4 points. Paul Carter played just 5 minutes, a decision I don't understand at all except for the fact he plays the same position as Damian Johnson and Tubby clearly wanted the senior on the floor. However, I think the Gophers would benefit from having Johnson and Carter on the floor together at times. 

After the game last night, I let out a long sigh. I sort of expected this outcome as the second half continued. I guess that comes from being a lifelong fan of Minnesota sports. Fatalism has set in, that's for sure. But 10 hours or so later, I've come to the comforting opinion that this Minnesota team had a real chance to beat a top 5 team last night, even if Purdue was significantly undermanned.  And I'm trying to think real hard about the next two years with Sampson owning the paint. There are positives, friends, but damn that one hurt last night.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good summary

Good game Gophers.

Ever Grateful. Ever True.

by PurdueMatt on Feb 25, 2010 12:22 PM CST reply actions  

Good spin

Thanks for the positive spin. I was dreading reading recaps of this game.

I had a similiar feeling in the end, this season is over, but the future looks bright. RS3’s coming out party against a good post defender. Devoe Joe running the point well enough. It was a tough, tough loss, no doubt about it, but there is hope!

by eazydp on Feb 25, 2010 12:25 PM CST reply actions  

I feel you, but...

I thought Sampson, Iverson and Johnson were playing so well together that they didn’t need to bring in Carter.

I thought it was pretty interesting that Devoe and Blake played the entire second half. I imagine that he played Blake the entire second half so that they couldn’t collapse on the big men with double teams. It was impressive how diligent Purdue was with blanketing the Hoff. They did not overeact when Sampson and Iverson were tearing them up inside and drift off hoffarber for double teams and leave him with open looks.

I know that this comes as little consolation right now, but i think we have seen some very encouraging steps with the players late in the season. All of the talent on this team is with the sophomores, and we have been clamoring for them to show some life and improve. Well I think we can all say that they have shown steady improvement over the course of the season. It is possible that it is just three games, but Colton, Ralph and Devoe have all played much better recently and that is very encouraging.

by tc_brent on Feb 25, 2010 12:43 PM CST reply actions  

I agree on the rationale for keeping DJ, Colton and Iverson out there at Carter’s expense, but there were times when either DJ, Iverson or Sampson were on the bench and Carter could have been on the floor instead of a third guard.

Also agree that Purdue didn’t overreact to Sampson/Iverson in the post, however they did certainly sag down to protect the post. I think Sampson needs to continue shooting that outside shot. Maybe not the three, but a jumper just inside the three point line.

Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher

by PJS on Feb 25, 2010 2:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Iverson

Do officials know how to call fouls on players defending big men? Not tall guys like Sampson, but strong guys like Iverson. He gets guys putting two hands into his back, pushing him out every time he caught the pass inside the lane, no call. He so much as looks at another player, its a foul. Tubby needs to have Iverson’s back and really rip into the officials the next time a bad call is made against him. I get the sense that Iverson is going to have a boiling-over point and just knock someone’s block off otherwise.

by mraveling on Feb 25, 2010 1:00 PM CST reply actions  

College officials don’t know how to call charges vs. blocks and when there’s a big guy like Iverson against a twerp like Kramer, Kramer gets the call.

Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher

by PJS on Feb 25, 2010 2:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Just flop

If you’re defending Iverson, just fall over, they’ll call a charge.

by DJL44 on Feb 25, 2010 7:24 PM CST up reply actions  

When Sampson realizes how good he can be

he will be awesome. Hope he figures it out before next season.

by Rumblebee on Feb 25, 2010 1:44 PM CST reply actions  

He still has a long way to go

I cringe every time he brings the ball down to his knees when he gets it in the post. It’s a horrible habit.

Maroon and Gold Headquarters: The Daily Gopher

by PJS on Feb 26, 2010 9:17 AM CST up reply actions  

This just in:

Hummel out for the year, ACL injury

by hapshaughnessy on Feb 26, 2010 7:13 AM CST reply actions  

Play of the Game

this was the one that killed us.

Gophers up 1
51 seconds left – Joseph misses a jumper
Iverson grabs the rebound and akwardly throws the ball in the general vacinity of the hoop
Purdue gets the “rebound” outlets for a fastbreak lay-up and foul

Moore missed the free throw but that was their first lead. Had Iverson scored or better yet kicked it out to run down the clock that would have made all the difference in the world. Had he grabbed the ball, gone up strong and scored that would have up us up 3 and not given them an easy transition basket. At the very least we run off 35 more seconds and still have the lead. Maybe we score and go up 3 with 20 seconds or fewer left.

I don’t rail on the individuals much, but that particular play was the one that turned everything.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Feb 26, 2010 8:58 AM CST reply actions  

I feel like defending Iverson

even though I did not see the shot in question. I realize CI is rough around the edges and still a project, but I like what he brings to the court——his physicality is a good compliment to Sampson. I like his energy and he is always the first guy to give a high five or help a teammate up off the floor. He is not a total liability at the FT line. Now, the blown shot was taken with less than 50 seconds and Purdue gets the ball but that means the Gophers will get the ball for the final shot to at worse tie the game and most likely win it. How many of us would have taken that scenario??

by Texas Gopher on Feb 26, 2010 9:30 AM CST reply actions  

if you didn't see it then it is hard to understand

First – I like Iverson as well and I’m not blaming him for the loss. Pointing out that play which was THE play that turned everything.

Maybe this is a clearer explanation. He rebounded the ball but his momentum was taking him towards the baseline. He wasn’t falling just not going towards the basket. The ball got twisted in his hands and he ended up throwing it towards the basket with one hand, like a shot put. Rather than securing the ball and his center of balance he flung the ball towards the hoop. I’m AOK with him taking the shot to put us up 3, but it needed to be a real shot, not a throw like there was 1 second left. Instead the ball didn’t hit rim, was tipped out by a Purdue player which resulted in a 3-on-1 where Hoffarber feabily attempted to foul Moore. If he isn’t set for a shot then pull it in, kick it out and run 35 seconds off. Had he just gathered himself he easily would have been able to go up for an easy 2 or more than likely a 3-pnt play. Even if we don’t score at the very least it wouldn’t have resulted in an easy lay-up for Purdue.

It is in the video here on ESPN’s highlights.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Feb 26, 2010 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

GN

thanks for the video link. Here is what I think happened: great hustle rebound, secured the ball, kept it high, and lost his balance (little tweak of ankle??). It looked to me like he had one of those “oh shit” moments knowing he was going down and instead of getting a traveling called, just threw it up there. I agree it was ugly and a major factor in the end result of the game. However, I like the guy’s hustle and he fills a role every team needs. Mistakes like that I can handle.

by Texas Gopher on Feb 26, 2010 11:50 AM CST reply actions  

don't misunderstand

I’m not “ripping” Iverson or saying he cost us anything. There were several other plays that could have been all throughout the game that could have made a huge difference. It is a fast game, things like this happen. Could have happened to anyone, it was just kind of huge since it led to fastbreak lay-up at a critical time of the game.

I’m not calling into question his hustle or ability. He just went up without actually securing the ball, it twisted in his hands as he was going up and his reaction was to shove it with the one hand still on the ball. As PJS pointed out an upperclassman would have dunked that or had the quick reaction to kick it out and run clock when we had the lead, at home, against a #3 team.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you

by GopherNation on Feb 26, 2010 12:39 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minnesota Golden Gophers sports--Usually analytical, sometimes snarky.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

47487
New Uniforms!
M_nerf_small
B1G/PAC Matchups
Small
Can Minnesota get to a bowl game in 2012?
Ishot-2_small
A modest proposal to eliminate 15 bowl games and send their mediocre teams home for the holidays
Mn_basketball_small
Big Ten Bloggers Pick'em Standings
Small
Minnesota Gophers Should be Happy to Have Jerry Kill
Small
Eat More (Bucknell) Bison
Small
Gophers vs. Augustana in review
Small
Gophers vs Vikings (hoops)
47487
HATE WEEK IS HERE!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mn_basketball_small GopherNation

Imagescary7xfo_small Jeffrick

Img-20101223-00043_small JDMill

Editors

Imgres_small PJS

Bigbuck_small Buck Bravo

Dsc02076_small JG2112