Wide Receiver positional preview - Upgrade / Downgrade
If we are only trying to answer the question as to whether or not this position group is an upgrade or a downgrade then this should be a pretty quick post (and might not meet the SBN required 75 word minimum). When you lose a guy like Eric Decker and you don't replace him with another All-American caliber receiver then this is a going to be a downgrade. And let's not forget that we have also lost our second leading receiver, Nick Tow-Arnett. Together the two combined for 43.7% of the team's receptions, 47% of the 2009 yards and 53.3% of the team's touchdowns. Those are big numbers when we are talking about just two guys.
First...the guys we'll be missing.
Eric Decker was a joy to watch play for the Gophers. He was tough, he was extremely productive and represented the Gophers very well. I look forward to watching him play on Sunday's. He was the one offensive player we have had that defenses feared. And most impressively, defenses game planned to stop him but they rarely did. Not much needs to be said of the best receiver to wear a Gopher uniform. He holds or nearly holds every major receiver record and he missed 6 games over his last two seasons.
Nick Tow-Arnett was second on the team in receptions and always seemed to come through when he was needed most. His 8 receptions, 81 yards and 2 TDs against Michigan State was easily his most productive game as a senior and it was when the passing game needed him most. This was obviously the first game with Decker. And one of my favorite plays of the season was when the Gophers were trailing late in the third to Air Force. On 3rd and 25, Weber and Nick Tow-Arnett hooked up for a 25 yard first down. He seemed to come up with big third down catch after big third down catch. He was one of the quiet heroes of the 2009 Gopher season.
The good news is that everyone else returns, the bad news is that our three leading returning receivers average just 21 catches, 303 yards and 1 touchdown apiece. And our most productive returning tight end? He is returning his one catch for 12 yards. The numbers are not inspiring but that doesn't mean all hope is lost.
Da'Jon McKnight is a big target who also happens to be very athletic. His returning 17 catches and 311 yards isn't impressive but there is anticipation for his junior season for two big reasons. First of all, he recorded all of his 2009 stats after Decker went down for the season. When looking at his numbers in that light, knowing it was all in just 5 games, there is reason for optimism. Secondly it is rather important to note that Mcknight didn't even begin playing football until his senior year in high school. He is big, he is fast and he has steadily improved throughout his career. If anyone is going to step up and be the go-to receiver McKnight is capable of doing it.
Troy Stoudermire is the team's leading returner in touchdowns and receptions. Stoudermire is the big play receiver who really is capable of getting the ball out in space and taking it for 6. He is a dangerous kick returner and I expect the Gopher offense will make quite an effort to get the ball in Stoudermire's hands often. The very first play of the spring game was an end-around to Stoudermire. Not that he'll touch the ball every-other play, but I think it shows that the Horton offense will get the ball in Troy's hands on a more regular basis.
Brandon Green is the other receiver in this assumed top three. Green was a four-star receiver coming out of high school and this is the year he hopefully breaks out and starts putting up some more impressive numbers. He is a solid route runner and he has good hands. My biggest complaint with Green is that he has trouble getting separation from DBs and isn't as open as he could be. 21 catches in each of his first two seasons is pretty good but I'd love to see him above 40 catches this year and really establish himself as a reliable play-maker in the passing game. He is certainly capable.
Other returning receivers are Hayo Carpenter and Bryant Allen. Hayo came in with some hype last year as a four-star incoming JUCO. The hope was that he'd be a perfect compliment to Decker last year but that never materialized. He finished the year with 2 catches and 43 yards in 10 games. I don't know that he'll be super productive but he needs to give us more than 2 catches this year. You can see he has some explosiveness to him, but it needs to show up on the field. Bryant Allen had a solid freshman season and he also has some obvious explosiveness to him. His biggest contribution was as punt returner but he also caught 5 passes while seeing action in all 12 games as a true freshman. He is recovering from injury and may not be full speed when the season starts.
Back to the tight ends for a moment. As mentioned Eric Lair is the team's leading returner at this position with one catch. But don't let that be too discouraging. Tow-Arnett went from 10 catches in his junior year to 37 as a senior when given more opportunities. Lair is a big and very athletic tight end who figures to play a big role in the passing game. I think you'll conservatively see him get 25+ catches this year. Just based on tight ends I think we may be upgrading, and that is with all kinds of respect for Nick Tow-Arnett. The other tight end you'll see a lot of on the field is giant JUCO transfer, Tiree Eure. At 6-7, 255 Eure is supposed to be a very good blocker who also is a good receiver. I am always most comfortable with a JUCO who spent the spring in Minnesota learning the offense and working out with the team.
When you lose Decker and a reliable tight end like Tow-Arnett, this has to be viewed as a downgrade. In the Gopher's case you are luck to have a handful of talented players who are set to step up and fill the vacancy with the sum of their parts. I am looking forward to this year's passing attack and different receiving options we have.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This one is a blatant downgrade
Decker is/was a special player. I think we do have some talent here, but nobody with Decker’s ability.
yup
I like our group of receivers, but you can’t replace a Decker.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher
Decker
Say no more. Just need all of the receivers to appreciate the opportunity they had to learn from him and strive as a group to bridge the aperture created by his absence.
I’m going to say ………. UPGRADE, and here’s why.
After Decker went down last year the offense had issues, but eventually other wide receivers were able to have productive games, including during the bowl game.
Now, what’s the emphasis this year? The offensive line. Wills, Carufel and the rest should be significantly improved over 2009. The WRs returning, including Allen, Carpenter, McKnight and Green, have another year’s experience. They should obtain the benefit of play-action passing that actually sucks up the LBers and Safeties because of the team’s commitment to the run game.
The offense has also been simplified for Weber, yet, at the same time, defenses will not have Decker to key off of.
Finally, Hoese was and I presume remains a viable option in dump-offs and screens, and Lair and Eure should provide a more physical TE option than TA did last year.
I think that the emphasis on the O-line, combined with any sort of diversification of the WR/TE/RB pass-play calling (beyond GET IT TO DECKER AND PRAY) should lead to a statistical upgrade for the WRs this year.
Yes, maybe crazy. It’s the Ewing Theory in Minnesota.
Statistics is not a fair comparison
With Decker out for four games last year, if this group all remains healthy, they might have better season statistics. But, that is not a fair comparison and I think you realize that. The measure of upgrade/downgrade is the POTENCY of the passing game. We are scaring nobody without Decker.
"Athletic"
Whenever I read bullish news on this season’s Gophers squad, I repeatedly here the term “more athletic” used in various ways for various people and positions. I’m glad there is some hope for the team, but I feel like it all hinges upon this one term. How were the outgoing players less “athletic”, and how does that translate to the field of play?
I know that you can point to NFL combine sorts of measures to say a player is more “athletic” than another. Yet, these attributes do not necessarily correlate to success. Jerry Rice wasn’t the fastest receiver. Tom Brady doesn’t have the strongest arm. Adrian Petersen doesn’t squat the most of all running backs.
I am seeing much more optimism around this team than I thought I would this year. I hate being the pessimistic one, but I just don’t see how we are going to be as good as we all think given the level of success last year and the chassis that remains this year. It just seems like too many things all have to go right when most of these things never do for us. We are supposed to be counting on breakout players at nearly every position despite inexperience, injury, or lack of prior performance.
I hope to be proved wrong.
it is rather ambiguous
but I think it is true. Tinsley vs. Campbell is a good example. Campbell was a 245 LB who was big, strong and disciplined but he wasn’t the fastest guy on the field and didn’t excel at coverage. Tinsley is strong, not as big as Campbell but faster. I think Rallis in place of Triplett is another good example of increased athleticism. Moving a safety to LB is usually going give you a better athlete at the position.
At the receiver position having “athletes” is valuable as those guys are going to be better leapers and potentially faster. If they can learn the learnable aspects of the game (route running, reading a defense, hands, etc) then they are better equipped to really succeed. Lair is a significantly better athlete than NTA. He is bigger and faster, assuming he learns is blocking assignments and can get himself open he has the tools to be MUCH more productive than NTA.
It all comes down to learning the things that can be taught. I remember the days of Hightower and Davis at LB. Those guys were athletic but they bit on every playfake and misdirection putting them out of position on nearly every play. In that case their athleticism did very little to help.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher
by GopherNation on Aug 16, 2010 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions
Upgrade for the passing game
From a strictly personnel standpoint you have to say its a downgrade as we lost our two most productive players. However I think the passing game as a whole should be better for 3 reasons.
1 – the running game should be at least somewhat better, opening up the playaction game and maybe bringing some safeties down towards the LOS
2 – The added experience of the 3 top WRs should mean more legitimate options than there were last year, in part because of #3
3 – simpler system. A big issue for the WRs last year was that Fisch had an NFL offense requiring the WRs to be able to read defenses, make adjustments on the fly, and generally know the offense as well as the QB. Now when 3 of your top 4 WRs were true sophs, 2 of whom hadn’t played WR until they got to college, that’s a large task. Those guys were still learning how to play WR and they had to learn complex reads too. I have a feeling Horton’s offense will be more user friendly and allow the WRs natural talents to take over a bit. Last year for all Fisch’s talk, they never made any effort to get TS the ball in space, never used McKnight’s athleticism in the RZ, and didn’t make an effort to take advantage of Green’s route running and hands until 4th quarters.
Also, I think Lair will be a very good player for us. The kid came in as a raw, 205lb kid with excellent speed and now he’s a 240lb guy that’s had a chance to learn behind 2 NFL caliber TEs. He still should have very good speed for a TE and I look for him to do damage over the middle.
agreed
that the passing game will be better for the reasons you mentioned (plus the OL should be better).
I’m really looking forward to Horton’s game play-calling. Fisch never seemed to have a plan. A college OC always needs to be a play or two ahead of the game and he was always reacting. I hope to see Horton putting a defense on their heels with play-action, screens and easy quick-hitters to keep the ball in the hands of the offense. Assuming they execute, the passing game could be more productive.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher
by GopherNation on Aug 17, 2010 9:43 AM CDT up reply actions
The WILD CARD
I think you forgot one key player in our wide-receiver corps for the season: MarQueis Gray! I am fairly confident that Weber will rebound from his horrid season and put up his best numbers as a college QB. This means less time for Gray at the position, and Minnesota will do their best to get him in the game. The Star Tribune has reported that Gray has worked out with the receivers, while still remaining the number 2 QB. What do you think his impact will be on the WR group?
He could be our Eric Decker replacement
now that it’s confirmed that he is practicing with the WR’s.
"they're calling insane hogs???"
Steve Watson
Also, how well do you think Steve Watson will do at getting the most from his receivers? I don’t know who our WR coach was last year, but this guy sounds like a great fit.
good point
I did not talk about Gray, he could be a huge wildcard in the passing receiving game.
I really like the Watson hire, he is teaching these kids to block and to be football players, not just athletes. I said it in another post but I think we’ll look back and really be pleased with this hire.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by 












