Despite Optimism, Some Pre-Season Questions
The pundits are nearly universal in their assertion that the Gophers are going to be a horrible football team this fall. Predictions of 2 or 3 win seasons, with one or even no wins in conference, are all over the internet.
Right or wrong, those of us who count ourselves as fans of this squad have a more optimistic view. Many have seen the Gophers practice or scrimmage and have had first hand views of the talent that this Gopher team has. Many feel that despite the tough schedule the Gophers have and the list of things that are against the Gophers that this team has a different feel with a truly "team" attitude.
I am certainly among those who are optimistic that the Gophers will at least pull out a .500 season and head to another bowl game. But there are absolutely some things to be nervous about as we look forward the Gophers kicking things off in Murfreesboro on September 2nd.
Here are a couple of things that I'm a bit nervous about as we head toward the season and what questions I think need to be answered.
Adam Weber's accuracy
Enough people are saying that Adam Weber's confidence is back, but I haven't heard much talk about his accuracy. One of Weber's big issues last season was inaccurate passes to even wide open receivers. Often hitting WR's high over the middle, putting them in danger of injury, or throwing to the wrong shoulder of a running back in the flat, there were plenty of examples of Weber's poor accuracy last season. The fact is that Weber's poor passes often limited how effective his receivers could be after the catch.
With his increased confidence, will Adam Weber's accuracy as a passer improve?
Cornerback Play
The Daily Gopher has learned that Simmons and Sherels are gone. In their place as starters at the CB position will likely be Michael Carter and Ryan Collado. Quite a pair these two: Carter the ultra-talented CB who the Gophers stole from West Virginia with just one year of experience, Collado the ultra-experienced CB who has been very good in run defense over the years but maddeningly inconsistent in pass defense.
We know Carter has the talent, but being in only his second season, is he ready to be an every game starter and the #1 CB on the Gopher squad?
Has Collado grown enough as a pass defender to be an every-down CB?
Linebackers
That was a fine, fine LB group last season. The talent of Simoni Lawrence, Nate Tripplet and Lee Campbell was a boost to the Gopher defense... but so was their experience. They were well versed in the pace and physicality of Big Ten play and worked well as a unit.
There's reason for optimism as we've heard nothing but good things about Mike Rallis at strong-side linebacker, but what do we have outside of Mike Rallis? Questions.
We know the trio of Gary Tinsley, Spencer Reeves and Keanon Coooper is talented, but will they be ready to step up to cover the middle and the weak-side?
Will a true starting group of linebackers emerge?
Can this group gel the way that the previous squad of LB's did as a unit?
Running game
Plenty has been made of the poor offensive line play over the last couple of years, and that the O-line will be manned by players with a lot of experience this season, which means things should be much better.
But the actual running backs haven't been discussed often as part of the problem in the running game in the past. In my mind, offensive line experience aside, there are plenty of questions at running back.
Will the burst of speed and toughness that we saw out of Duane Bennett in the first few games of 2008 be back now that he should be fully recovered from injury?
Is DeLeon Eskridge a suitable Big Ten running back?
Is the early steam on Donnell Kirkwood legit? Have we finally found a back that can actually "pound the rock"?
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with your question set.
If all of these unknowns end up in Minnesota’s favor (unlikely), you could be looking at about an 8 win team. If the opposite is true (also unlikely), about 3 wins could be a reality. I forsee a mix, with about a 5 or 6 win season.
Buck Bravo
by Buck Bravo on Aug 23, 2010 1:22 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
You forgot the biggest worry of all...
The Schedule
While this may be a more “talented” and “athletic” team than last year, the biggest worry has to be the schedule. While I am agnostic to the idea that we are more talented, I don’t think anyone will argue that our schedule is much tougher this year.
Many have pointed to the MTSU opener as a serious challenge—and I’m actually more optimistic about that game than perhaps most. MTSU certainly is solid, but they lost handedly to the likes of Clemson and Mississippi State last year. I’m not saying they should be taken lightly—but they are still a team we should beat.
Obviously, USC is going to be a very tough game. I hold out some optimism for that game given the mess that USC has become. Still, if gambling were legal, I would bet on USC. We should beat SDSU and Northern Illinois—although no win has EVER come easy under Brewster.
So that puts our non-conference record at 3-1. A good start.
That is where it ends. Our conference schedule is incredibly tough where all of our best chances to win are on the road—Purdue, Illinois, and Michigan State. Our home games are stacked against us—Penn State, Ohio State, and Iowa. Northwestern at home is certainly a winnable game, but won’t be easy. I see our conference record shaping up to 1-7.
That makes for a 4-8 record. The sad thing is, we may very well be a better team than last year, but not many will know it.
I agree that the schedule is a concern...
but it’s out of our control. We have to play that schedule.
I guess I was more focusing on things within our control. Certainly we can’t control players that we lost to graduation (or drinking: Maresh), but we can hopefully control how smart we play, how we scheme, improvement of skills, etc.
"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher
Yep
Does a “competetive” 4-8 keep Brew around? Personally, I’ll start a fund to get Mike Leach on campus.
by Minnesota Fats on Aug 23, 2010 7:36 PM CDT up reply actions
I think I'm going with 6-6 (the optimist in me can't resist)
The schedule in order of difficulty…
USD – W
NIU – W
@MTSU – W
@Ill – W
@Pur – L
NU – W
@MSU – L
PSU – L
Iowa – W
@Wis – L
USC – L
OSU – L
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher
JDMill
I think the answer to your Eskridge question is “no.” I like the guy and he seems like a nice young man, but I don’t see a Big Ten RB. Hopefully, he can buy into being a special teams player.
I’ll give Eskridge the benefit of the doubt. I’ve heard he’s much bigger and stroner, over 210 lb. If true and he hangs onto the ball while blocking well, he could end up a solid back.
Buck Bravo
by Buck Bravo on Aug 23, 2010 3:57 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
wait...
we have a guy who is bigger/stronger/faster on this team? I hadn’t heard that.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher
by GopherNation on Aug 23, 2010 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps “suitable” left the question too open. That leaves a lot of interpretation.
I think Eskridge will get playing time until he graduates, but the truth is that he will probably never be a featured type of back. He doesn’t have breakaway speed, isn’t particularly quick in hitting the holes, and isn’t very shifty. I think he’s probably serviceable as a change of pace back or, if he continues to add bulk, perhaps as a short yardage specialist.
I do think that DeLeon has pretty good hands as a pass catcher out of the backfield, so his versatility might give him options.
"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher
I like him catching passes out in the flat
I think he has good speed, he just takes a while to get to that top gear. Kirkwood is the opposite, he doesn’t have great speed but he maxes out in a hurry.
what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher
by GopherNation on Aug 23, 2010 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions

by 












