Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Minnesota Football: In win over MTSU, Gopher Defense did it's job.

Here's what you already know...

*Minnesota held a 45:34 to 14:26 time off possession advantage of MTSU.

*Minnesota ran the ball 67 times, while MTSU rushed only 22 times.

*Minnesota rushed for 281 yards, while MTSU rushed for 146 yards.

*The Gophers held the ball for 14:19 on their final two drives... just 5 seconds less than MTSU held it the entire game.

Those are nearly staggering numbers for any college football game.  The Gophers ability to run the ball against the Blue Raiders lead to a TOP gap that was so dominating that it couldn't be called anything but an unmitigated success. 

The Gophers had 5 drives that were over 5 minutes long, including a defense crippling, game icing 9 minute drive that essentially turned into a 14 minute drive when the Gophers got the ball back on the ensuing kickoff.  MTSU had the ball for less than 6 minutes the entire second half, and a mere 2 minutes in the 4th quarter.  

Final score aside, that is an incredibly dominating performance.  (On a side note, I'm slightly surprised that I haven't seen more made of the offenses inability to finish drives... thanks in large part to special teams.)

But time of possession isn't just about offensive and rushing dominance, because the defense has to do their part too.  

Most of the discussion around Gold Country has been about the offense, and rightfully so.  But I don't think that what the defense did on Thursday night is anything to sneeze at.  And believe me, I get it, the second quarter was a complete mess for the defense, but as a whole, the defense did a pretty good job of getting MTSU's offense off the field.

Consider this...

*Even with the two TD drives (which seemed like they were taking forever while I was watching them), MTSU didn't have a single drive that lasted over 2 minutes.

*MTSU had only ONE drive that lasted more than 5 plays.

*MTSU averaged just 4.5 plays/drive.

Again, I get it.  The second quarter, and actually just the second half of the second quarter, was a complete clustermuck.  But what if the Gophers had been able to hold MTSU to those same numbers, but the scoring drives were spread out over 2 or 3 quarters?  Wouldn't you feel like the defensive performance was outstanding?

My point is this: the defense plays a large role in the time of possession battle and the Gopher defense absolutely did its job in winning their portion of that battle.  The strength of this team is supposed to be the experienced offense with the 4 year starting quarterback, and 4th largest offensive line in the country.  That being the case, the defense's job is to get off the field, and get the ball back to the strength of the team.  

Despite the hiccups, a defense littered with young players that had zero returning starters, did it's job last Thursday night.  

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Something to build on

I think this game is definitely something to build on for the young D. Obviously they made mistakes, but if they learn from them, they’ll be just fine. Can’t wait to see them get better in the coming weeks.

by MinnMarchDTF on Sep 7, 2010 11:24 AM CDT reply actions  

Excellent point. A young squad might need some moral victories to build on before they get into the tougher competition.

"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher

by JDMill on Sep 7, 2010 11:27 AM CDT reply actions  

there are some areas for concern though

their 22 carries for 146 yards is a 6.6 yd average! The secondary was very soft. Lewis was ugly as as safety. And the overall tackling needs to dramatically improve.

But the DL did a fine job, the LBs were usually in position to a make plays and the coverage didn’t allow many big plays (at least no REALLY big plays). The first play of the second half when Tinsley filled his gap and had their RB for no gain but whiffed; which resulted in a huge run play was a good example of being in the right spot but just have to make the play.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Sep 7, 2010 11:30 AM CDT reply actions  

The defense did play well

for the most part. Some poor tackling led to some big gains, and hence, their scoring drives weren’t very time consuming. Being in position is good—it shows that the players are executing the game plan correctly and the coaches are putting them in position to succeed. More experience will hopefully mean better tackling in the future.

The thing with poor tackling is that you don’t know if it is a one time thing, or will be a continuing problem. If guys are out of position, coaching can help with that. There isn’t a whole lot that can be done when guys just plain don’t finish off the play.

by rencito on Sep 7, 2010 12:10 PM CDT reply actions  

Tangent

Okay, its not exactly a tangent—it is completely off topic, but TCU and Boise State could meet in the national championship game. Of course, it will take a loss from Alabama and Ohio State, but it is not that far off from a reality.

It would be ironic, and fitting, if two non-BCS schools end up in the championship game and THAT is what causes the most clamoring for a playoff as opposed to their ABSENCE from such a game. Sweet irony.

The truth of the matter is that TCU actually has a pretty tough schedule. They just played Oregon State and then they will have to play the MWC—which is a lot better than people think with the likes of BYU, Utah, Air Force, et al.

by rencito on Sep 7, 2010 12:14 PM CDT reply actions  

that might be the only scenario to prompt BCS confereces to get a playoff

I still think most people believe it will take 2 losses from all other contenders before TCU or Boise would make the title game. I know all of the ESPN guys thought it would take 2 losses for even Boise to make it, even with their #3 preseason ranking.

Every year I cheer for whatever scenario makes the BCS look the worst. Go Broncos and Go Horned Frogs.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Sep 7, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Every year I cheer for whatever scenario makes the BCS look the worst.

+1,000

"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher

by JDMill on Sep 7, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Glass half-empty

I’m going to disagree with GN on this topic. The defense only did its job in the sense that the team got a ‘W.’ But they had about as little as possible to do with that outcome. The Time of Possession is a terrific indication of how well the offense performed. It’s entirely misleading, however, when it comes to Minnesota’s defense since the TOP discrepancy actually would have been less drastic had the defense not been sliced and diced for the 2nd quarter and early 3rd.

They did force one turnover (which basically fell into Rallis’ arms), but they got zero pressure on the QB and made very few big plays. The third-down defensive stats would look worse had MTSU needed three downs to move the sticks for much of the night.

I realize they are young and will most likely improve with game experience, but here’s the bottom line: If Cosgrove and Lee don’t find a way to get consistent pressure on the QB, they won’t create turnovers and that rookie secondary will get sliced and diced beginning with the USC game.

Journalism. Enhanced.

by MNdailyGuy on Sep 7, 2010 1:32 PM CDT reply actions  

My point was that if the defense’s job is to get the ball back in the hands of the offense, averaging just 4.5 plays/drive is a pretty good indication that they did that.

"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher

by JDMill on Sep 7, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

3rd down % was what they did best imo

We currently lead the Big Ten in Def 3rd Dwn %. Obviously leading the conference is meaningless after 1 game but 1/8 was pretty good.

what you say here can, and will, be used against you The Daily Gopher

by GopherNation on Sep 7, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

The stats about the TOP sound good but those 2 scoring drives are how MTSU is designed to run. They want to fly down the field with that fast paced, no huddle offense. They don’t want to have drives of 5+minutes. The D had a good game outside of those two drives but TOP isn’t a great indicator considering the type of offense MTSU runs

by oleboy41 on Sep 7, 2010 2:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Yawn...

This is silly talk. The defense was average and they got a lot of help. For example, first series the MTSU inexperienced QB slides a yard before a first down to cause a punt. Then we got consecutive pass interference penalties on balls Weber shouldn’t have thrown (per anybody with football knowledge) which led to touchdowns instead of (arguably) missed field goals. Somehow this game has turned into “we really won by 14 points”…and I’m not there guys. We played an undermanned team from a lesser conference and it took a series of favorable bounces to walk away winners.

We did just enough to win and show that somehow we have gotten significantly worse in the past 4-5 years. We may be faster, but that just makes us better looking losers this season.

The more I’ve thought about the MTSU game (and watched the DVR of it during my morning workouts), the more upset I get that the program has gotten to this level of crap.

Maybe I’m just bitter about the White Sox collapse and the Twins inability to lose….ha! Good day to you all. Go Gophers!

by jimipig on Sep 9, 2010 9:54 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Minnesota Golden Gophers sports--Usually analytical, sometimes snarky.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Epson003-2_small
Gophers @ Nebraska
47487
New Uniforms!
M_nerf_small
B1G/PAC Matchups
Small
Can Minnesota get to a bowl game in 2012?
Ishot-2_small
A modest proposal to eliminate 15 bowl games and send their mediocre teams home for the holidays
Mn_basketball_small
Big Ten Bloggers Pick'em Standings
Small
Minnesota Gophers Should be Happy to Have Jerry Kill
Small
Eat More (Bucknell) Bison

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Mn_basketball_small GopherNation

Imagescary7xfo_small Jeffrick

Img-20101223-00043_small JDMill

Editors

Imgres_small PJS

Bigbuck_small Buck Bravo

Dsc02076_small JG2112