Minnesota Football: The case for a two-headed backfield
The glory days of the Glen Mason years featured a running attack that was one of the best in the nation. Mason had talented and bruising offensive lines that could open up holes that you could drive a car through. And those teams had a couple of running backs that knew what to do with those holes.
Marion Barber III and Laurence Maroney as running backs were probably more similar to each other than they were different, but their differences are what made them such an effective 1-2 punch. Maroney could scorch you outside with this speed, and Barber could lower his shoulder and make you pay for trying to tackle him.
Fast forward to 2011, and we don't have an MB3 or a Laurence Maroney on this Golden Gopher football team. Those were special players that played behind special offensive lines, and we just don't have that kind of talent at RB right now.
But we do have two backs who are similar in stature, but different in styles who just might compliment each other well.
Duane Bennett is like a Mustang, and a Mustang is important in any offense. You need a quick back who is tough and can hit the line, but who can also bounce a run outside when a hole closes up, get outside around a DE, and turn on the jets down the sideline.
You need a Mustang.
But sometimes you need a one-ton pickup. And I think Donnell Kirkwood has the ability to play MB3 to Duane Bennett's Laurence Maroney.
When Duane Bennett gets a hand-off, he's looking for a whole, but he doesn't need one to make things happen. If Bennett can get a little space, or get outside, he's got the ability accelerate quickly and really bite off big chunks of yards. He can run around you, he can spin by you, and he can change direction to make you miss. He's not afraid to run up the middle, and he doesn't avoid it, but it's not where he's best.
When Kirkwood gets the ball, and he sees a hole, he absolutely attacks it. There isn't a thought in his mind about bouncing it outside, or backing off. He's got a bit more of a bowling ball frame than Bennett, so if there happens to be somebody who comes in to fill that hole, they are going to get the full wrath of Kirkwood's frame. And because Kirkwood runs his nuts off every single time he has the ball, that defender is going to get Kirkwood's full wrath and they are probably going to go backwards because DK only knows how to fall forward.
If Matt Limegrover wants to establish a running presence up the middle early in games, he should be doing it with Donnell Kirkwood, not Duane Bennett. Thus far it seems that instead of staggering these two backs, Limegrover has chosen to give a heavy dose of Bennett early, and then sprinkle Kirkwood in throughout the game.
But in my opinion, the best way to use these two guys is to keep defenses off balance throughout the entire game, along with, of course, the threat of Gray running at any time. This would give the Gophers the chance to establish things up the middle, but still keep the defense honest with some runs bouncing outside, and a few QB draws for good measure.
The bottom-line is that this offense needs to figure out a way to be able to run the ball with the running backs so that Q can focus on being a quarterback sometimes. Remember the last time that we had a QB who was also our leading rusher?
It was Adam Weber in 2007. Remember how well that worked out?
(And remember who our one win was that season?)
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Well
Q is no Webber.
But I’ve not been impressed with Bennett so far. It’s early, and maybe it’s that the holes haven’t been there, but he has looked like nothing specially.
I really liked Kirkwood’s aggressiveness this week though. The combination of Q and Kirkwood was effective, and at this point my preference would be to give him more carries at Bennett’s expense.
But Kirkwood may be more similar to Gary Russell than Barber, which is just fine with me.
A couple of things
First, I wouldn’t say that we had bruising offensive linemen during our heyday. If I recall, we had the smallest offensive line in the Big Ten that utilized their speed to pull and zone block. We also had runners who could find their own space in this scheme. In our case now, we have neither.
I also think the Weber comparison is unfair since we lost 5 games where we scored over 30 points—offense clearly wasn’t the problem. This year, our offense isn’t as good as it was in 2007 and our defense is just as bad.
Our linemen...
…had incredible fundamentals. Award winning fundamentals. Leverage. Mason spent his time on his offensive line. Those guys were awesome college offensive linemen.
I’m not sure we have the personnel for 2 headed monsters…blocking tight ends needed in that type of system, also need good blocking receivers. It’s a whole system overhaul.
Just my two bits….off the cuff and not well thought-out.
Also need running backs
We don’t have a Mr. Outside. Nobody has those kind of quicks. Lamonte is probably getting moved to defense because that is where he belongs (has no RB instincts). Both Bennett and Kirkwood are between-the-tackles kind of runners, in my opinion. Different styles but both still better suited for north-south running.
I don't think Bennett is a between the tackles RB
I had high hopes for him the year he got hurt and he was well on his way until he tore his ACL against Bowling Green.
Now, I think he is more of a third down back who can catch a pass and do his damage in the open field. That is his problem as a RB—he can’t get to the open field. The offensive line certainly does him no favors.
The bottom-line is that this offense needs to figure out a way to be able to run the ball with the running backs so that Q can focus on being a quarterback sometimes. Remember the last time that we had a QB who was also our leading rusher?
It isn’t the system that’s flawed,it’s the implementation. If we’re going to change the entire system,then I would also see them go with a QB whose strength is passing first. The season is still young ,with a VERY young,inexperienced but talented O line. Why on earth change your approach at this juncture? One of the biggest flaws of the prior regime was changing O coordinators on an annual basis. I trust in Jerry to stick with what has worked for him in the past,and recruit players to fit into that system. Patience,please.
Nobody is saying to change the entire system
From day 1 Limegrover has said that the RB position would be important, I was simply offering a way to get the RB position going. I don’t think Bennett alone has the skill set to be the end-all-be-all back in this offense.
"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher
@jdmill
I don't get why people keep invoking the Weber example
Having Q, a guy who can run and carry the ball effectively, as the leading rusher isn’t comparable to having Weber, I guy who couldn’t and wasn’t.
Or, to state is more clearly, Q running is good. Weber running was bad.
Why?
Why does everyone insist that our O-line is talented? I’m not sure we have a lineman who would start on any other team in the B1G. It seems like people have been saying we have O-lineman who are going to be great for three years now. I don’t think we have any talent at that position.
True dat...
….god damn these guys are terrible right now. I know they won’t get worse like Benny Button did at QB for us the past 4 years….so I guess by that logic I assume they will get better as they get stronger and learn proper technique that nobody ever taught them.
Thank you Glen Mason
"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher
@jdmill
Nope - dual-threat is where its at unless you have Andrew Luck
don’t buy the comparison at all with Weber and 2007 for reasons mentioned but of course they should establish a couple of RBs as well. They go together and then you get play action benefit. Unless you have an elite drop-back QB – you need a QB like Gray. He is improving each game – someone on the schedule is going to catch him when he gets hot throwing as well and it will lead to an upset or two.
Let's be clear
I’m not comparing Q and Weber, I was only saying that 2007 was the last time our QB was our leading rusher, and that year didn’t go so well.
"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher
@jdmill
at the risk of being too blunt, so what?
Unless Q rushing is somehow like Weber rushing?
When in Rome...
Agree to disagree? I don’t know. Never my intention to compare them.
My only point really is that when your QB, whatever his name happens to be, is your leading rusher, it doesn’t say much about your RB’s… this is my opinion. I’m sure there are others who think it doesn’t matter as long as you’re getting those yards. Potato, Potatoe.
"We're talking about unchecked aggression here, Dude."
Off Tackle Empire
The Daily Gopher
@jdmill
run game
Between Q and Kirkwood you can wear a team down tacking those two. Both are big and Kirk looks to deliver the shot to would be tacklers. 15 touches Max for Q and 20-25 for Kirk should be about right. This depends on out ability to convert on 3rd downs of course which means Q has to complete some medium to short passes
by DallasGopher on Sep 23, 2011 10:14 AM CDT via iPhone app reply actions

by 













